Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
zIFBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to Loose Change Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


Pages: (5) [1] 2 3 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post )

 Wtc7 23 Minute Warning Before The Collapse, Unusual BBC report of the WTC7 collapse
abcd
Posted: Feb 25 2007, 03:34 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 290
Member No.: 825
Joined: 31-October 06



I don't know how far its true but, I found this on google videos-

On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or (World Trade Building 7) had collapsed.


Video- WTC-7 BBC reporting


BBC WTC-7 Videos

Edited to add the correct videos
Top
Reggie_perrin
Posted: Feb 25 2007, 03:59 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 3,302
Member No.: 6
Joined: 18-October 06



:blink:

Top
fretwire
Posted: Feb 25 2007, 07:04 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 44
Member No.: 259
Joined: 19-October 06



Very interesting to say the least. If you watch the video, you can clearly see WTC 7 in the background of the live reporting.

What will probably happen is you'll get the old "we knew it was going to collapse anyway" excuse from the govt.
Top
Reggie_perrin
Posted: Feb 25 2007, 07:30 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 3,302
Member No.: 6
Joined: 18-October 06



Trying to play devils advocate, but maybe it was put out that it might collapse and it's been misconstrued by reporters and once it reached the studio it became "has collapsed", but still then they would be predicting something that has never before, in the history of steel framed sky scrapers, happened, so it would still beg the question, 'HOW' did somebody know it was going to collapse ? given that steel frame buildings rarly (ever?) collapse from fires.

The collapse of wtc7 takes another twist.
Top
Starbelly
Posted: Feb 25 2007, 09:18 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 348
Member No.: 258
Joined: 19-October 06



What. The. Fuck.

Is this for real? First ive heard of it.

Does this coincide with the claims from people like Craig Bartmer who says he was told WTC7 was goin to be coming down?

Top
Starbelly
Posted: Feb 25 2007, 09:24 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 348
Member No.: 258
Joined: 19-October 06



QUOTE (Reggie_perrin @ Feb 26 2007, 12:30 AM)
Trying to play devils advocate, but maybe it was put out that it might collapse and it's been misconstrued by reporters and once it reached the studio it became "has collapsed", but still then they would be predicting something that has never before, in the history of steel framed sky scrapers, happened, so it would still beg the question, 'HOW' did somebody know it was going to collapse ? given that steel frame buildings rarly (ever?) collapse from fires.

The collapse of wtc7 takes another twist.

Not to mention how did they know it was WTC 7 that was coming down. Despite how damaged you want to say it was. Wasnt WTC 5 and 6 engulfed in flames? Besides WTC 7 was further away from the towers than those others buildings

Really crazy how BBC were reporting its collapse nearing 30 minutes before its sudden 6.5 second collapse.
Top
waterdancer
Posted: Feb 25 2007, 09:33 PM


polymeta search Sibel Edmonds bradblog


Group: Members
Posts: 150
Member No.: 462
Joined: 21-October 06



This isn't the first early collapse report I've run across, though it is the first from an actual news source that I've seen. In a couple of internet forums I've run across early reports-one even as early as sometime in the late morning, something like, a third building has now collapsed a fifty story building near the world trade centers. I wish I could find that one again. Some early reports show up in this thread, for instance. Looks like a pre north tower north tower collapse report and a CNN WTC 7 may well collapse report about an hour prior to the collapse.
Top
btbalance
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 01:11 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 76
Member No.: 171
Joined: 19-October 06



wow..

the clip of the live shot begins at 14:50:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=14...9%2F11#014m50ss

Top
shure
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 03:38 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Gone
Posts: 905
Member No.: 1,281
Joined: 24-December 06



AMazing isn't it !!!!!!!!

(Posted Image)


Updates Link:
http://www.shure.proboards19.com/index.cgi?board=bbc

;)
Top
Dereck Breuning
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 04:11 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 282
Member No.: 1,400
Joined: 5-January 07



QUOTE (Reggie_perrin @ Feb 26 2007, 12:30 AM)
Trying to play devils advocate, but maybe it was put out that it might collapse and it's been misconstrued by reporters and once it reached the studio it became "has collapsed", but still then they would be predicting something that has never before, in the history of steel framed sky scrapers, happened, so it would still beg the question, 'HOW' did somebody know it was going to collapse ? given that steel frame buildings rarly (ever?) collapse from fires.

The collapse of wtc7 takes another twist.

Uhm, it's a reporter and his studio's duty to report actual facts and correct information. So the whole maybe it was misinterpreted thing doesn't add up.

It is really weird that they report it approx. 30min. before the building actually comes down. Maybe someone leaked a copy of the script for that day?

"Who writes this shit?"
Top
Coersion
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 04:35 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 128
Member No.: 878
Joined: 6-November 06



What. The. Hell ?

:blink:

That is damning footage
Top
DoYouEverWonder
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 04:49 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 433
Member No.: 2,410
Joined: 19-February 07



Did they adjust for Daylight Savings Time?
Top
Coersion
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 04:59 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 128
Member No.: 878
Joined: 6-November 06



lol, I hope your not being serious :P , the building is still standing in the background.
Top
sesshin
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 05:40 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 38
Member No.: 2,524
Joined: 23-February 07



Quoted from one of the firemen:

QUOTE
Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
Division 1 - 33 years

...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.


So they knew that the building was going to collapse at least three hours before it actually did. The BBC probably heard about the impending collapse and misinterpreted that to mean the building had already collapsed. So really its just nothing more than sloppy reporting, which isn't surprising considering how chaotic that day was.
Top
28th Kingdom
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 06:01 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Gone
Posts: 552
Member No.: 1,754
Joined: 25-January 07



#1 Sesshin... yer a maggot... deal with it...

#2 Who is this reporter... he's already talking about exchanging freedom for security... there is something very strange about this video.

#3 Sesshin... yer still a fvcking maggot, so shut up.
Top
shure
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 06:06 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Gone
Posts: 905
Member No.: 1,281
Joined: 24-December 06



QUOTE (sesshin @ Feb 26 2007, 10:40 AM)
Quoted from one of the firemen:

QUOTE
Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
Division 1 - 33 years

...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.


So they knew that the building was going to collapse at least three hours before it actually did. The BBC probably heard about the impending collapse and misinterpreted that to mean the building had already collapsed. So really its just nothing more than sloppy reporting, which isn't surprising considering how chaotic that day was.

They started reporting at 4:57pm (EST) that WTC 7 had collapsed and were still reporting that it had collapsed while she was standing in front of the building with her big HEAD !

They continued to report it had collapsed all the way up to the live feed "MYSTERIOUSLY" blacking out just minutes before WTC 7 actually fell at 5:20pm (EST) !!!!!!!!

COME ON NOW !

NOBODY IS A GOOD ENOUGH LIAR TO TALK THIER WAY OUT OF THIS ONE !

--------------------------------------------------
Danny Jowenko just reconfirmed on Friday Feb. 23 2007
THAT THERE WAS NO WAY FIRE BROUGHT DOWN WTC 7 !

Danny Jowenko conversation Youtube link thanx to "einsteen"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QajDxF9uEf4
Top
Rpaul
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 06:23 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 131
Member No.: 2,080
Joined: 10-February 07



QUOTE
They started reporting at 4:57pm (EST) that WTC 7 had collapsed and were still reporting that it had collapsed while she was standing in front of the building with her big HEAD !

:lol:

They just kept on diggin their hole while she was blabbing on. Until some nasty party pooper wised up.
Their only possible excuse is they confused had collapsed with was going to collapse, that doesn't work because it was repeated over and over again that the building had collapsed, the lead shill even went so far as to say the building was probably empty.

It's a great video.
Top
shure
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 08:57 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Gone
Posts: 905
Member No.: 1,281
Joined: 24-December 06



Here are the phone calls the the BBC inquiring about this damning Evidence !

click link below to listen or right click and save target as to download:

Phoen calls to BBC letting them know thier oops !

<_<
Top
Coersion
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 10:38 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 128
Member No.: 878
Joined: 6-November 06



Wow that's awesome man, wonder if she will bother having a look.

Either way, if Alex hasn't seen this yet then someone should get the video over to prisonplanet.
Top
miragememories
Posted: Feb 26 2007, 11:47 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 1,333
Member No.: 364
Joined: 20-October 06



I think too much is getting read into this.

Clearly this report was rushed to air before any research had been done. It's likely all the repeated 'on-the-street' reports about the imminent collapse of WTC7 eventually got distorted by a reporter, and "gonna collapse" became "did collapse."

It was a major gaff on the BBC's part for sure, especially given the fact that no one immediately identified the burning building behind their 'live' reporter as the 'still standing' WTC7 building which she was claiming had already collapsed. Since it was the last major standing structure still pouring out heavy smoke on the site, you'd think they might have checked it's identity..amazing..unbelievably poor work on their part.

You would have thought in the roughly 7 hours that passed after the collapse of WTC1, that the BBC Research Dept. would have located maps and visuals of the area so they would be familiar with what they were seeing in their 'live' feed, or, duh..had there on-the-scene people find out for them..I guess they figured that the clearly viewable smoking 47-storey building in their live feed must have been WTC7a, WTC7's twin tower?

It's also pathetic that no one at the BBC seemed to wonder why none of their satellite feeds from the major American TV networks were reporting such a major event. Did they not ask themselves how odd it was that no one but their on-the-scene reporter noticed the sudden collapse of this 47-storey building?

Talk about extremely sloppy..maybe it will damage their credibility regarding the recent 9/11 'hit piece'?

MM
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | WTC 7 | Next Newest »
zIFBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Learn More · Sign-up Now

Topic OptionsPages: (5) [1] 2 3 ... Last »



Hosted for free by zIFBoards* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0309 seconds · Archive