Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
zIFBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to Loose Change Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


Pages: (14) « First ... 12 13 [14]  ( Go to first unread post )

 Wtc7 Still Up For Debate?
quicknthedead
Posted: Oct 7 2007, 12:11 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 39
Member No.: 1,232
Joined: 19-December 06



QUOTE (holycanoli @ Oct 7 2007, 01:10 AM)

How do you wire a 47 story building for destruciton without anybody noticing (you'd have to saw through floors, walls, etc...to access the skeleton), without interrupting any utilities (such sawing would cut through piping and conduit), and the cables alone would be noticable to the most casual observer?

Controlled demolition requires tons of explosives, months of planning, pinpoint placement of charges, and total access to the entire building. 

Nobody reported seeing any cables, interruption of utilities on a large scale, the army of technicians that would be involved, or giant holes in the floors or the walls.

Please explain how the building was wired with none of the above happening.


Danny Jowenko said it was a CD, so we don't have to come up with answers.

That should be the province for a real investigation that must be formed.

Read my post before yours.
Top
Slamin
Posted: Oct 7 2007, 12:44 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 157
Member No.: 3,521
Joined: 31-March 07




So what the f*ck - pick the lowest point since 9/11 and the highest point and sound the trumpets?

How intellecualy stupid do you think we are?

Get real dude - take the low point and high point over a five year period and you will see one hell of a lot of company stocks rise five or six fold.

Invasion of Iraq

Date Requested 03/20/03
Closing Price $10.56
Volume 14,912,400


Fridays close

Date Requested 10/05/07
Closing Price $38.98
Volume 9,213,100


10.56 to 38.98 - about 270 %

BHP Bilton, an Australian mining giant is up 636% in the same time frame

Kinda kills that whole war profiting theory huh? Or is that mining giant also part of the in crowd?

If you compare Haliburton with the S&P from September 11, 2001 forward, it does not out perform the S&P until late Setpember 2004 - that's three years before the stock shows a profit over the rest of the pack and a full 19 months after the invasion.

So keep cherry picking your arguments, and your stock prices. What a f@cking joke!
Top
Pentagon reality check
Posted: Oct 7 2007, 01:23 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 298
Member No.: 7,215
Joined: 20-September 07



Is it possible Halliburton managed to conceal it profits for 'political interests,' and even while handed massive contracts and getting its foot further in the door with new long-term projects overseas, it only appears to have done not so well initially? Money can be shuttled around, as the Enron thing shows, and still somehow retrieved and profited from, and one good way to avoid war profiteering charges is to APPEAR to not be really profiting?

I don'y know shit about high end economics, just a thought.
Top
Slamin
Posted: Oct 7 2007, 07:17 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 157
Member No.: 3,521
Joined: 31-March 07



QUOTE (Pentagon reality check @ Oct 7 2007, 01:23 AM)
Is it possible Halliburton managed to conceal it profits for 'political interests,' and even while handed massive contracts and getting its foot further in the door with new long-term projects overseas, it only appears to have done not so well initially? Money can be shuttled around, as the Enron thing shows, and still somehow retrieved and profited from, and one good way to avoid war profiteering charges is to APPEAR to not be really profiting?

I don'y know shit about high end economics, just a thought.

Not in the post Enron world with the SEC watching.

Publically traded means public information.
Top
chris sarns
Posted: Oct 11 2007, 03:30 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 491
Member No.: 691
Joined: 26-October 06



QUOTE (Slamin @ Oct 6 2007, 09:44 PM)
So what the f*ck - pick the lowest point since 9/11 and the highest point and sound the trumpets?

How intellecualy stupid do you think we are?

If you wish to be judged by that statement, i would have to say extremely "intellecualy [sp] stupid"
Top
AMCOR
  Posted: Oct 23 2007, 02:27 PM


AMCOR


Group: Members
Posts: 37
Member No.: 6,362
Joined: 17-August 07



.


(Posted Image)


NO PLANE HIT WTC-7, YET IT STILL FELL.!?


.
Top
AMCOR
  Posted: Oct 23 2007, 03:21 PM


AMCOR


Group: Members
Posts: 37
Member No.: 6,362
Joined: 17-August 07



QUOTE (Graham @ Oct 23 2006, 03:15 AM)

Why do we not have occurances of these melting all around the world?



Excellent Point. Also, why has no other building in History and after 9/11 fallen as a result of a fire.?! Interesting isnt it. 3 buildings fell in one day, and no other buildings ever have fallen like that before, and most likely none will ever fall like that again.


.
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | WTC 7 | Next Newest »
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you

Topic OptionsPages: (14) « First ... 12 13 [14] 



Hosted for free by zIFBoards* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0251 seconds · Archive