Create your own social network with a free forum.
zIFBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to Loose Change Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


 

 Reichstag Fire Culprit's Conviction Overturned, more truth
Lin Kuei
Posted: Jan 12 2008, 11:43 AM


logical progression


Group: Admin
Posts: 770
Member No.: 1,896
Joined: 2-February 07



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/arti...in_page_id=1811
German prosecutors said they have formally overturned the conviction of a Dutch communist who was executed after the Nazis accused him of torching the Reichstag parliament building in 1933.

Marinus van der Lubbe, a bricklayer, was convicted of arson and high treason in December 1933 and executed on Jan. 10, 1934.

The federal prosecutor's office said in a statement that it formally "declared that the verdict ... is overturned" on Dec. 6.

It said that it made the move after being alerted to the case by a Berlin lawyer, who it did not identify, and that the conviction was overturned automatically under a 1998 law allowing for the rehabilitation of people convicted of crimes under the Nazis.

Historians still debate whether van der Lubbe, a communist, actually set the Feb. 27, 1933 fire, which came just a month after Adolf Hitler's rise to power and was followed by the suspension of civil liberties.

Some believe the Nazis set it themselves to give Hitler an excuse for his crackdown against what he termed a "communist conspiracy."

Van der Lubbe was the only defendant convicted of arson at the subsequent trial. Four other communists charged with him were acquitted by a Leipzig court.

Federal prosecutors said his conviction was overturned because the death sentence resulted from measures introduced under the Nazis "that were created to implement the National Socialist regime and enabled breaches of basic conceptions of justice."
Top
dylan avery
Posted: Jan 12 2008, 12:35 PM


I am whatever you say I am


Group: Admin
Posts: 2,811
Member No.: 2
Joined: 17-October 06



Damn conspiracy theorist German prosecutors!
Top
Arbor
Posted: Jan 12 2008, 02:09 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 680
Member No.: 6,799
Joined: 2-September 07



I have one big problem with this. The Federal Republic of Germany..IS NOT Nazi Germany. I dont think they should have to over-turn rulings of a regime that they did not inherit.

It is a new Germany. Its like the USA overturning convictions of treason handed down by New Amsterdam in 1654.
Top
mynameis
Posted: Jan 12 2008, 02:22 PM


If you're a troll, you get dead air from me.


Group: Members
Posts: 4,823
Member No.: 856
Joined: 4-November 06



QUOTE (Arbor @ Jan 12 2008, 07:09 PM)
I have one big problem with this. The Federal Republic of Germany..IS NOT Nazi Germany. I dont think they should have to over-turn rulings of a regime that they did not inherit.

It is a new Germany. Its like the USA overturning convictions of treason handed down by New Amsterdam in 1654.

It doesn't matter. Get over yourself.
Top
Lin Kuei
Posted: Jan 12 2008, 02:41 PM


logical progression


Group: Admin
Posts: 770
Member No.: 1,896
Joined: 2-February 07



QUOTE (mynameis @ Jan 12 2008, 07:22 PM)
It doesn't matter. Get over yourself.

Owned. :lol:
Top
Arbor
Posted: Jan 12 2008, 05:17 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 680
Member No.: 6,799
Joined: 2-September 07



you're right. it really doesnt matter.

not owned, by the way.

:D
Top
IVXX
Posted: Jan 12 2008, 05:36 PM


MDCCLXXVI


Group: Admin
Posts: 5,109
Member No.: 378
Joined: 20-October 06



QUOTE (Arbor @ Jan 12 2008, 02:09 PM)
I have one big problem with this.  The Federal Republic of Germany..IS NOT Nazi Germany.  I dont think they should have to over-turn rulings of a regime that they did not inherit. 

It is a new Germany.  Its like the USA overturning convictions of treason handed down by New Amsterdam in 1654.

If the Nazis could have held onto Germany, The Federal Republic Of Germany wouldn't be overturning their convictions.

I mean when we toppled Sadam should we not have free those wrongly imprisoned or imprisoned under a rule we didn't agree with?? Should we have not you know, overturned convictions??

One question. By your logic here should we still condemned the Jews or keep that one overturned??
Top
Arbor
Posted: Jan 12 2008, 07:15 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 680
Member No.: 6,799
Joined: 2-September 07



in my humble opinion, the nazi regime was simply and utterly criminal. there was no need to overturn the nuremberg laws or any of the other racist laws, as they were criminal and should have been considered null and void.
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Latest News Section | Next Newest »
zIFBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
Learn More · Register Now

Topic Options



Hosted for free by zIFBoards* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0343 seconds · Archive