zIFBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.

Learn More · Sign-up for Free
Welcome to Loose Change Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


 

 New Evidence In Jfk Assassination, May cause case to re-open
seeker135
Posted: Jan 5 2008, 05:38 PM


Death to Tyrants


Group: Members
Posts: 3,157
Member No.: 3,469
Joined: 28-March 07



Article and video.

http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2...-re-opened.html

Maybe we can set the record straight, now. Then we go to work on who killed his kid.
Top
Lark
Posted: Jan 5 2008, 07:33 PM


Ranb sock puppet


Group: Gone
Posts: 18
Member No.: 9,677
Joined: 24-December 07



Interesting article. What part was the most significant to you?

I thought "While they do not claim evidence to prove a second gunman participated, they say the original fragments of the bullets recovered from the scene of the shooting should be re-examined." and "hits upon one reason why people cannot accept that Oswald, armed with a $12 rifle, could be responsible for such an epic event."

They still have much work left to do. I wonder why people have a hard time believing a person could have shot someone from the TSBD? The rifle had the power and accuracy required. The target was moving slowly away at a small angle and was less than 100 yards away.

Lark
Top
blackcat
Posted: Jan 6 2008, 05:12 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 92
Member No.: 903
Joined: 10-November 06



QUOTE
The rifle had the power and accuracy required

But the shooter did not - and it was impossible to reload and shoot again with such speed!
Top
Powerhouse
Posted: Jan 14 2008, 01:17 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 1,039
Member No.: 5,359
Joined: 21-June 07



The only thing even relatively new there is last year's announcement about the lead analysis, and that simply says that you can't be as certain that the bullet fragments came from that one bullet as we once thought. So what? There's still a mountain of other evidence even if you throw that completely out.


QUOTE
But the shooter did not - and it was impossible to reload and shoot again with such speed!

He had between 8 and 9 seconds to work the bolt, aim, and fire twice. That's easily done.
Top
canadaeh
Posted: Jan 15 2008, 11:20 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 85
Member No.: 283
Joined: 19-October 06



You guys should check out this guys website. He has been researching the assassination for many years and offers some good insight.

http://www.patspeer.com/

I would also recommend watching Evidence of Revision on Google video. It is long and in 5 parts but well worth the watch.
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Other Conspiracy | Next Newest »
zIFBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
Learn More · Sign-up for Free

Topic Options



Hosted for free by zIFBoards* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0272 seconds · Archive