|· RULES · Portal||Help Search Members Calendar|
|Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )||Resend Validation Email|
|Welcome to Loose Change Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.|
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:
Posted: Dec 26 2007, 09:59 AM
If you're a troll, you get dead air from me.
Member No.: 856
Joined: 4-November 06
BitTorrent search site loses case
Bulldozer destroying pirated DVDs and CDs, Reuters
The film industry is aiming to stop movie piracy
A website which facilitated the online exchange of films, music and TV programmes without permission has lost a US copyright case.
TorrentSpy was taken to court by the Motion Picture Association of America.
A judge made a default ruling in favour of the MPAA after she said the site's operators had tampered with evidence.
The site had ignored an order to retain server logs and the unique online addresses of computers which traded files using the BitTorrent program.
The ruling could have personal privacy implications because the information TorrentSpy had been told to retain was held in Random Access Memory of computers.
Defendants Justin Bunnell, Forrest Parker, Wes Parker and Valence Media originally had argued that its servers were located in the Netherlands and so were protected by Dutch law from having to turn over server logs.
The judge then asked for information from the Ram in their computers but the defendants failed in their attempt to argue the data was temporary and therefore could not be retained.
The defendants' conduct was "obstreperous," Judge Florence-Marie Cooper wrote in her decision.
"They have engaged in widespread and systematic efforts to destroy evidence and have provided false testimony under oath in a effort to hide evidence of such destruction.
"A substantial number of items of evidence have been destroyed," she wrote. "Defendants were on notice that this information would be of importance in this case."
TorrentSpy's lawyer Ira Rothken said his clients had concerns about protecting users' privacy.
TorrentSpy is expected to appeal Judge Cooper's decision.
A ruling on damages will happen at a later date.
The MPAA, which filed the case against TorrentSpy in February 2006, welcomed the ruling.
"The court's decision... sends a potent message to future defendants that this egregious behaviour will not be tolerated by the judicial system," John Malcolm, the MPAA's executive vice president and director of worldwide anti-piracy operations, said in a statement.
"The sole purpose of TorrentSpy and sites like it is to facilitate and promote the unlawful dissemination of copyrighted content. TorrentSpy is a one-stop shop for copyright infringement."