Pages: (10) [1] 2 3 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post )

 Official Statement Confirms Detonations On 9/11, I found the pdf...
davecahill
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 09:06 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 46
Member No.: 5,056
Joined: 5-June 07



http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF

I just found the pdf by searching his name, check it out on page 15.

Official Statement Confirms Detonations on 9/11

RINF Alternative News
Thursday November 1, 2007

Smoking gun testimony, demolition detonations reported by top brass in official statement

The rank of this witness is:
CAPTAIN KARIN DESHORE OF BATTALION 46

CAPTAIN KARIN DESHORE QUOTE :

“SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT.

“INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS I COULD SEE.

"THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER, GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING. I WENT INSIDE AND TOLD EVERYBODY THAT THE OTHER BUILDING OR THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION OCCURRING UP THERE AND SAID THINK WE HAVE ANOTHER MAJOR EXPLOSION. I DONT KNOW IF WE ARE ALL GOING TO BE SAFE HERE.”

The second building was being demolished.

The complete interview will be published on RINF shortly.
Top
look-up
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 09:51 AM


A WTC 7 No-Planer


Group: Members
Posts: 5,768
Member No.: 654
Joined: 25-October 06



whoa.. if accurate, this interview could be very... umm "explosive" testimony.

Seriously though. This could be HUUUUUUGE!!!
Top
Lin Kuei
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 11:05 AM


logical progression


Group: Admin
Posts: 770
Member No.: 1,896
Joined: 2-February 07



Wow this is huge.

More work for Mark Roberts I guess
Top
valuesize
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 11:12 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Gone
Posts: 363
Member No.: 7,609
Joined: 10-October 07



QUOTE (davecahill @ Nov 1 2007, 09:06 AM)
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/...HIC/9110192.PDF

I just found the pdf by searching his name, check it out on page 15.

Official Statement Confirms Detonations on 9/11

RINF Alternative News
Thursday November 1, 2007

Smoking gun testimony, demolition detonations reported by top brass in official statement

The rank of this witness is:
CAPTAIN KARIN DESHORE OF BATTALION 46

CAPTAIN KARIN DESHORE QUOTE :

“SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT.

“INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS I COULD SEE.

"THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER, GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING. I WENT INSIDE AND TOLD EVERYBODY THAT THE OTHER BUILDING OR THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION OCCURRING UP THERE AND SAID THINK WE HAVE ANOTHER MAJOR EXPLOSION. I DONT KNOW IF WE ARE ALL GOING TO BE SAFE HERE.”

The second building was being demolished.

The complete interview will be published on RINF shortly.


So this interview took place November 1, 2007....today. I wonder if this person was interviewed before?
Top
Nolan Ganwich
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 11:16 AM


bbc4truth@yahoo.co.uk


Group: Members
Posts: 223
Member No.: 3,143
Joined: 16-March 07



QUOTE (Lin Kuei @ Nov 1 2007, 11:05 AM)
Wow this is huge.

More work for Mark Roberts I guess

Why more work for roberts, does someone need to know the best place to take a dump in NY?
Top
sozei
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 11:32 AM


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Member No.: 33
Joined: 18-October 06



WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEW
CAPTAIN KARIN DESHORE
INTERVIEW DATE NOVEMBER 7 , 2001
TRANSCRIBED BY ELISABETH NASON
Top
bretwalda
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 11:37 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 323
Member No.: 4,191
Joined: 26-April 07



QUOTE
So this interview took place November 1, 2007....today. I wonder if this person was interviewed before?


Wow - we can't read, therefore it can't be true? :lol: :lol:

"Interview Date: Nov 1, 2001"

:rolleyes:
Top
chrisfarb
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 11:41 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 495
Member No.: 122
Joined: 18-October 06



QUOTE (bretwalda @ Nov 1 2007, 11:37 AM)
QUOTE
So this interview took place November 1, 2007....today. I wonder if this person was interviewed before?


Wow - we can't read, therefore it can't be true? :lol: :lol:

"Interview Date: Nov 1, 2001"

:rolleyes:

Ouch.
Top
chucksheen
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 12:19 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 2,542
Member No.: 2,680
Joined: 28-February 07



Thanks.

Downloaded.

Adding to http://9-11.Meetup.com/322 and sending out to members.

Printing...
Top
valuesize
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 12:43 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Gone
Posts: 363
Member No.: 7,609
Joined: 10-October 07



QUOTE (chrisfarb @ Nov 1 2007, 11:41 AM)
QUOTE (bretwalda @ Nov 1 2007, 11:37 AM)
QUOTE
So this interview took place November 1, 2007....today. I wonder if this person was interviewed before?


Wow - we can't read, therefore it can't be true? :lol: :lol:

"Interview Date: Nov 1, 2001"

:rolleyes:

Ouch.

LOL Whoops. I should have gotten more sleep last night. Anyone corroborating her story?
Top
chucksheen
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 02:06 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 2,542
Member No.: 2,680
Joined: 28-February 07



QUOTE (valuesize @ Nov 1 2007, 12:43 PM)
QUOTE (chrisfarb @ Nov 1 2007, 11:41 AM)
QUOTE (bretwalda @ Nov 1 2007, 11:37 AM)
QUOTE
So this interview took place November 1, 2007....today. I wonder if this person was interviewed before?


Wow - we can't read, therefore it can't be true? :lol: :lol:

"Interview Date: Nov 1, 2001"

:rolleyes:

Ouch.

LOL Whoops. I should have gotten more sleep last night. Anyone corroborating her story?
Top
look-up
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 02:16 PM


A WTC 7 No-Planer


Group: Members
Posts: 5,768
Member No.: 654
Joined: 25-October 06



man i've never been able to figure out 9/11 blogger... every link to the "nodes" seem to all go to the front page for some reason... never actually to the story I want to read.
Top
chucksheen
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 05:40 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 2,542
Member No.: 2,680
Joined: 28-February 07



QUOTE
WHATEVER THIS EXPLOSION WAS SIMPLY
SUCKED ALL THE OXYGEN OUT OF THE AIR YOU COULDNT
BREATHE AND THE FEELING OF SUFFOCATION CANT EXPLAIN
NO FURTHER ON THAT
Top
kissing blarney
Posted: Nov 2 2007, 12:05 PM


make something idiot proof...they'll make a better idiot


Group: Members
Posts: 551
Member No.: 7,595
Joined: 9-October 07



Like many things here (especially things like this) it ends up being discussed "over there". The mindset of these people never ceases to amaze me. They like to apply Occam's razor to the towers i.e. plane hits tower>>>fire ensues>>>steel weakens>>>building collapses. But when it comes to expolsions it can be anything but expolsives...transfomers-not eplosives...fire extinguishers-not expolsives...beams/columns snapping-not explosives...(the most sickening one) bodies hitting the pavement-not explosives...concrete breaking-not explosives and on and on and on.

The thread...if you care

http://www.randi.org/forumlive/showthread.php?t=97635
Top
valuesize
Posted: Nov 2 2007, 12:57 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Gone
Posts: 363
Member No.: 7,609
Joined: 10-October 07



QUOTE (kissing blarney @ Nov 2 2007, 12:05 PM)
Like many things here (especially things like this) it ends up being discussed "over there". The mindset of these people never ceases to amaze me. They like to apply Occam's razor to the towers i.e. plane hits tower>>>fire ensues>>>steel weakens>>>building collapses. But when it comes to expolsions it can be anything but expolsives...transfomers-not eplosives...fire extinguishers-not expolsives...beams/columns snapping-not explosives...(the most sickening one) bodies hitting the pavement-not explosives...concrete breaking-not explosives and on and on and on.

The thread...if you care

http://www.randi.org/forumlive/showthread.php?t=97635

There are lots of things which can explode in a fire, it would not be logical to assume that every "explosion" heard was due to an explosive device.
Top
Roxdog
Posted: Nov 2 2007, 01:14 PM


Why is Al Gore's House Bigger Than Everyone Else's?


Group: Members
Posts: 5,428
Member No.: 34
Joined: 18-October 06



QUOTE (valuesize @ Nov 2 2007, 11:57 AM)
There are lots of things which can explode in a fire, it would not be logical to assume that every "explosion" heard was due to an explosive device.

Explode like this?

QUOTE
“SOMEWHERE AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THERE WAS THIS ORANGE AND RED FLASH COMING OUT.

“INITIALLY IT WAS JUST ONE FLASH. THEN THIS FLASH JUST KEPT POPPING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING AND THAT BUILDING HAD STARTED TO EXPLODE. THE POPPING SOUND, AND WITH EACH POPPING SOUND IT WAS INITIALLY AN ORANGE AND THEN RED FLASH CAME OUT OF THE BUILDING AND THEN IT WOULD JUST GO ALL AROUND THE BUILDING ON BOTH SIDES AS FAR AS I COULD SEE.

"THESE POPPING SOUNDS AND THE EXPLOSIONS WERE GETTING BIGGER, GOING BOTH UP AND DOWN AND THEN ALL AROUND THE BUILDING. I WENT INSIDE AND TOLD EVERYBODY THAT THE OTHER BUILDING OR THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION OCCURRING UP THERE AND SAID THINK WE HAVE ANOTHER MAJOR EXPLOSION. I DONT KNOW IF WE ARE ALL GOING TO BE SAFE HERE.”


Please name some of these "things" you speak of...
Top
kissing blarney
Posted: Nov 2 2007, 01:27 PM


make something idiot proof...they'll make a better idiot


Group: Members
Posts: 551
Member No.: 7,595
Joined: 9-October 07



QUOTE (valuesize @ Nov 2 2007, 12:57 PM)
QUOTE (kissing blarney @ Nov 2 2007, 12:05 PM)
Like many things here (especially things like this) it ends up being discussed "over there".  The mindset of these people never ceases to amaze me.  They like to apply Occam's razor to the towers i.e.  plane hits tower>>>fire ensues>>>steel weakens>>>building collapses.  But when it comes to expolsions it can be anything but expolsives...transfomers-not eplosives...fire extinguishers-not expolsives...beams/columns snapping-not explosives...(the most sickening one) bodies hitting the pavement-not explosives...concrete breaking-not explosives and on and on and on.

The thread...if you care

http://www.randi.org/forumlive/showthread.php?t=97635

There are lots of things which can explode in a fire, it would not be logical to assume that every "explosion" heard was due to an explosive device.

But it would be logical to say that every explosion isn't???
Top
valuesize
Posted: Nov 2 2007, 01:55 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Gone
Posts: 363
Member No.: 7,609
Joined: 10-October 07



QUOTE (Roxdog @ Nov 2 2007, 01:14 PM)
QUOTE (valuesize @ Nov 2 2007, 11:57 AM)
There are lots of things which can explode in a fire, it would not be logical to assume that every "explosion" heard was due to an explosive device.

Explode like this?


That would be a great question for a firefighter.

QUOTE (Roxdog @ Nov 2 2007, 01:14 PM)
Please name some of these "things" you speak of...

Things? Transformers, fuel tanks, pressurized containers of who-knows-what, concrete breaking, beams breaking, elevators slamming into pits. Use your imagination. There's no reason to believe that a building that size wouldn't produce any type of explosion-sounding noise when on fire like it was, but again, a great question for a firefighter.

QUOTE (kissing blarney @ Nov 2 2007, 01:27 PM)
QUOTE (valuesize @ Nov 2 2007, 12:57 PM)

There are lots of things which can explode in a fire, it would not be logical to assume that every "explosion" heard was due to an explosive device.

But it would be logical to say that every explosion isn't???


Of course not. We know people heard explosions, and we know there are multiple possible sources for these sounds, so there's no reason to assume that they all came from a single source, or that none came from a single source based on that evidence alone.
Top
mynameis
Posted: Nov 2 2007, 02:04 PM


If you're a troll, you get dead air from me.


Group: Members
Posts: 4,823
Member No.: 856
Joined: 4-November 06



QUOTE (valuesize @ Nov 2 2007, 06:55 PM)
Of course not.  We know people heard explosions, and we know there are multiple possible sources for these sounds, so there's no reason to assume that they all came from a single source, or that none came from a single source based on that evidence alone.

Right cause there's a coke machine, high pressure extinguisher canisters, and propane stoves on every floor. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Top
valuesize
Posted: Nov 2 2007, 02:06 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Gone
Posts: 363
Member No.: 7,609
Joined: 10-October 07



QUOTE (mynameis @ Nov 2 2007, 02:04 PM)
QUOTE (valuesize @ Nov 2 2007, 06:55 PM)
Of course not.  We know people heard explosions, and we know there are multiple possible sources for these sounds, so there's no reason to assume that they all came from a single source, or that none came from a single source based on that evidence alone.

Right cause there's a coke machine, high pressure extinguisher canisters, and propane stoves on every floor. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Is it your belief that the only thing which could have made a noise like an explosion in the towers were explosives?

FYI: My office building does have coke machines and pressurized fire extinguishers in multiple locations on every floor. (But I never asserted that these explosions came from coke machines or propane stoves)
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | The Lounge | Next Newest »


Topic OptionsPages: (10) [1] 2 3 ... Last »



Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 7/7/05) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.2636 seconds | Archive