Create your own social network with a free forum.
zIFBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to Loose Change Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


 

 District Court Unseals Second 9/11 Inside Job Case, Dr Judy Wood / DEW
CB_Brooklyn
Posted: Oct 13 2007, 12:36 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 78
Member No.: 2,429
Joined: 20-February 07



US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 ‘Inside Job’ Case

Developments regarding Dr Judy Wood, a former Professor of Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University. Wood is represented by mainstream attorney Jerry Leaphart.


On September 12, 2007 the Southern New York District Court unsealed an “inside job” case. This complaint, filed by Dr Judy Wood against the private contractors hired by NIST, alleges the World Trade Center was destroyed by Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). Wood’s unsealed complaint is available here (in the Qui Tam section): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Dr James Fetzer, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, interviewed Dr Wood and Mr Leaphart on his October 11th Dynamic Duo radio show to discuss the new unsealed complaint. An MP3 of this broadcast is downloadable at this link: http://tinyurl.com/3dmpqo

Dr Fetzer also submitted a press release for this wonderful news. Read it and learn that NIST admitted to Dr Wood (in writing) that they did not analyze the “collapse” of the towers!
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ji...r_files__22.htm


One of the Defendants, Applied Research Associates (ARA), is a manufacturer of directed energy weapons :
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html

ARA is also a Silver Level Founding Sponsor of the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS). Founded in 1999, DEPS put out their first newsletter one year before 9/11, containing the following excerpt:

"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry."

http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf



Dr Wood has also discovered that the "Capabilities - National Defense and Aerospace" section of ARA's website contains an image depicting a simulation with the following characteristics:

1. A building (in the foreground) having damage similar to that of WTC 6 and the Murrah Building in OK City.

2. A building (behind the red building) with the same cosmetic design as WTC 3.

3. A building (in the background) turning to dust similar to the Twin Towers.

Here's the image:
(Posted Image)


See pages 3 and 4 of Dr Wood’s Appeal to NIST for information regarding that photo:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html

Here are pages 3 and 4:
(Posted Image)
(Posted Image)




Those skeptical of the directed energy weapon theory often ask how such a weapon could eject steel beams horizontally from the towers, as seem in some of the videos and photographs. Dr Wood says the DEW didn’t destroy the towers itself, but instead activated chemical clouds that were released from within the buildings; much like how light activates photographic film. Dr Wood has discovered photographic evidence of these chemical clouds coming from the towers, as well as WTC 7:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt5.html
http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/WTC7.html




The Evidence for Directed Energy Weapons is Very Strong!


**Let's take this Vertical Cut on WTC 4 as an example.
The building material on the other side of the cut is "missing".
Where'd it go?
(Posted Image)


**Has anyone noticed... the WTC 4 cut is in the same path as the South Tower's north wall?
The South Tower is also "missing".
(Posted Image)


**How about these Cylindrical Holes in WTC 5 and WTC 6?
What, if not a beam weapon, could make these?
(Posted Image)


**How about this video of the Steel Core Turning to Dust and trickling down?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVRh4U2BlhQ


**What type of weapon could destroy car engine blocks, yet leave unexploded gas tanks?
(Posted Image)


**This police car looks too weird.
(Posted Image)


**These cleanup workers certainly look puzzled.
What happened here?
(Posted Image)


**About 20 minutes before the South Tower is destroyed, the FAA orders all aircraft to land.
Two minutes after the North Tower is destroyed, the FAA allows military craft back up.
Why?
(Posted Image)



One must wonder... where did the towers go?


Look at these two comparisons. What happened?
(Posted Image)
(Posted Image)



Dr Wood has filed legal challenges, which provides an excellent opportunity for a new investigation.
She deserves our full support.
Top
Bongo Thud
Posted: Oct 13 2007, 03:06 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 273
Member No.: 4,921
Joined: 30-May 07



QUOTE (CB_Brooklyn @ Oct 13 2007, 12:36 AM)
US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 ‘Inside Job’ Case

Developments regarding Dr Judy Wood, a former Professor of Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University. Wood is represented by mainstream attorney Jerry Leaphart.


On September 12, 2007 the Southern New York District Court unsealed an “inside job” case. This complaint, filed by Dr Judy Wood against the private contractors hired by NIST, alleges the World Trade Center was destroyed by Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). Wood’s unsealed complaint is available here (in the Qui Tam section): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Dr James Fetzer, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, interviewed Dr Wood and Mr Leaphart on his October 11th Dynamic Duo radio show to discuss the new unsealed complaint. An MP3 of this broadcast is downloadable at this link: http://tinyurl.com/3dmpqo

Dr Fetzer also submitted a press release for this wonderful news. Read it and learn that NIST admitted to Dr Wood (in writing) that they did not analyze the “collapse” of the towers!
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ji...r_files__22.htm


One of the Defendants, Applied Research Associates (ARA), is a manufacturer of directed energy weapons :
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html

ARA is also a Silver Level Founding Sponsor of the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS). Founded in 1999, DEPS put out their first newsletter one year before 9/11, containing the following excerpt:

"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry."

http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf



Dr Wood has also discovered that the "Capabilities - National Defense and Aerospace" section of ARA's website contains an image depicting a simulation with the following characteristics:

1. A building (in the foreground) having damage similar to that of WTC 6 and the Murrah Building in OK City.

2. A building (behind the red building) with the same cosmetic design as WTC 3.

3. A building (in the background) turning to dust similar to the Twin Towers.

Here's the image:
(Posted Image)


See pages 3 and 4 of Dr Wood’s Appeal to NIST for information regarding that photo:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html

Here are pages 3 and 4:
(Posted Image)
(Posted Image)




Those skeptical of the directed energy weapon theory often ask how such a weapon could eject steel beams horizontally from the towers, as seem in some of the videos and photographs. Dr Wood says the DEW didn’t destroy the towers itself, but instead activated chemical clouds that were released from within the buildings; much like how light activates photographic film. Dr Wood has discovered photographic evidence of these chemical clouds coming from the towers, as well as WTC 7:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt5.html
http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/WTC7.html




The Evidence for Directed Energy Weapons is Very Strong!


**Let's take this Vertical Cut on WTC 4 as an example.
The building material on the other side of the cut is "missing".
Where'd it go?
(Posted Image)


**Has anyone noticed... the WTC 4 cut is in the same path as the South Tower's north wall?
The South Tower is also "missing".
(Posted Image)


**How about these Cylindrical Holes in WTC 5 and WTC 6?
What, if not a beam weapon, could make these?
(Posted Image)


**How about this video of the Steel Core Turning to Dust and trickling down?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVRh4U2BlhQ


**What type of weapon could destroy car engine blocks, yet leave unexploded gas tanks?
(Posted Image)


**This police car looks too weird.
(Posted Image)


**These cleanup workers certainly look puzzled.
What happened here?
(Posted Image)


**About 20 minutes before the South Tower is destroyed, the FAA orders all aircraft to land.
Two minutes after the North Tower is destroyed, the FAA allows military craft back up.
Why?
(Posted Image)



One must wonder... where did the towers go?


Look at these two comparisons. What happened?
(Posted Image)
(Posted Image)



Dr Wood has filed legal challenges, which provides an excellent opportunity for a new investigation.
She deserves our full support.

Nope.
Top
Rossmancer
Posted: Oct 13 2007, 05:48 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 267
Member No.: 6,508
Joined: 22-August 07



I think it's possible, but then what were those "bomb-like" noises people were hearing?
Top
CB_Brooklyn
Posted: Oct 14 2007, 12:27 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 78
Member No.: 2,429
Joined: 20-February 07



QUOTE (Rossmancer @ Oct 13 2007, 05:48 AM)
I think it's possible, but then what were those "bomb-like" noises people were hearing?

There most probably were bombs (explosives) too. But that's a decoy to lead the "truth movement" down the wrong path, away from the real perps. We all remember the New York Times WTC Task Force Interview transcripts, where all those FDNY personnel reported explosives. But why would the Times publish that? Does the Times tell the truth about 9/11, or do they hide it? Perhaps they published those to steer the "truth movement".

Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
Top
operator kos
Posted: Oct 15 2007, 12:59 AM


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 28
Member No.: 7,655
Joined: 13-October 07



Couldn't have summed it up more succinctly myself, Bongo.
Top
CB_Brooklyn
Posted: Oct 15 2007, 02:41 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 78
Member No.: 2,429
Joined: 20-February 07



QUOTE (operator kos @ Oct 15 2007, 12:59 AM)
Couldn't have summed it up more succinctly myself, Bongo.

the REAL truth of 9/11 will come out with or without your help.
Top
Bongo Thud
Posted: Oct 15 2007, 02:54 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 273
Member No.: 4,921
Joined: 30-May 07



QUOTE (CB_Brooklyn @ Oct 15 2007, 02:41 AM)
QUOTE (operator kos @ Oct 15 2007, 12:59 AM)
Couldn't have summed it up more succinctly myself, Bongo.

the REAL truth of 9/11 will come out with or without your help.

and with or without your persistent hindrance.
Top
CB_Brooklyn
Posted: Oct 27 2007, 08:26 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 78
Member No.: 2,429
Joined: 20-February 07



Download Dr Judy Wood's latest interview, with Ambrose Lane. She discusses several topics including her court case in the US District Court, Southern New York: MP3 LINK
Top
UKperspective
Posted: Nov 1 2007, 06:05 PM


Blunt Speaking Yorkshireman


Group: Members
Posts: 237
Member No.: 2,862
Joined: 5-March 07



I have spent some time reading Judy Wood's presentations from time to time over the last few months, and while she digs out some interesting pictures, and makes some really interesting observations. I just feel that for someone who is qualified so highly that they go by the title "Dr." she ought to be a little more professional in her presentations.

I am left with the overwhelming impression that she has uncovered some vital evidence and leapt to the wrong conclusion.

The melted cars and alignments of damage are inspired research, but her conclusions are difficult to substantiate.
Top
CB_Brooklyn
Posted: Nov 2 2007, 01:30 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 78
Member No.: 2,429
Joined: 20-February 07



I believe Dr Wood to be doing an excellent job at presenting her material, even forgetting the fact that she lost her job at Clemson, lost her 9/11 research student Michael Zebuhr to murder, and lost her instructors at Virginia Tech to murder.

Exactly how has Dr Wood leaped to the wrong conclusion? What, if not DEWs, can explain the data?
Top
UKperspective
Posted: Nov 2 2007, 03:20 AM


Blunt Speaking Yorkshireman


Group: Members
Posts: 237
Member No.: 2,862
Joined: 5-March 07



Well I don't know, which is why I said, "the impression was that I thought that she had lept to the wrong conclusion".

Overall I am grateful to see her research, but I feel that there should be a overarching demolition theory which ticks every single box. Including the explosions, the melted cars, the damage patterns to the other buildings etc.

Most of the other "scholars" miss out the Dr Judy Wood stuff, and I think they should all work together and not on their own slightly different pet theories.
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Latest News Section | Next Newest »
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you

Topic Options



Hosted for free by zIFBoards* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1091 seconds · Archive