|· RULES · Portal||Help Search Members Calendar|
|Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )||Resend Validation Email|
|Welcome to Loose Change Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.|
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:
|Pages: (10) « First ... 8 9  ( Go to first unread post )|
Posted: Sep 24 2007, 06:08 PM
Member No.: 7,307
Joined: 24-September 07
People across the political spectrum agree that the Bush administration is untrustworthy yet when it comes to 9/11, so many blindly accept that there WERE hijackers, per se. I'll remind all that we have only our own government's word on that one and so far that has shown to be something we can trust.
Few are familiar with the research of a handful of people whose discoveries were so unnerving to the establishment that it sicked some of its biggest 9/11 gatekeepers on them, gatekeepers that are, themselves, erroneously thought of as being legitimate journalists and by that I mean thought of as legitimate by the resistance. Hey, we can all be fooled. Here is a piece I wrote last year:
The 9/11 Information that Ruppert Doesn't Want You to Hear
|Pages: (10) « First ... 8 9 |