Another Great Research From Nico...not!, he just earn my "agent" side

Hi fellows, I guess with the strings of attention lately and wannabe researchers just dying to get me in the frucus to make a name for themselves, the latest is Nica trying its hand on attacking me.

http://www.911researchers.com/node/555

I learned from his research that I was an "agent" and handled by the same government I am attacking. The paper is so ridiculous that even goes to the Chroma Key bullshit of Johaneman being also superimposed on the news.

then you get your incitators around claiming that I should not attack their theories after they attack my experience. Notice how idiotic his paper and how he gets everything wrong except about my media contacts. He even got the wrong Salvatore Giambanco!!!!
"Good news for all of you there. I have 3 Giambanco interviews that will be included in the new DVD and also will be digitized for you tube"

This no-planers are getting really on my bad side and nope, again you are wrong Nica, I am far from Jesus like.

William

Stand tall William. We got your back, sir!

Thank you!!

:blink:

There are so many truly disgusting, evil, occultish criminals out there and they choose to focus on this? Seems like counter intelligence and counter intuitive to me. What a shame. Who is next to be attacked and targeted by the truth movement? Shure? Sibel Edmonds? Maybe there should be a face to face meeting of everyone involved to squash this?

Don't worry man, most people don't take him seriously, and MANY people take you seriously. You're a great man and they are nothing compared to you man, you're a hero. Keep on and don't worry about the haters...

Hi William...

There appears to be a sudden "push" in no-plane "TV Fakery" theories which trace their origins back to Nico Haupt. Over the past 3-4 days, we've been hit with some highly passionate posts promoting these theories:

ABC Live 911 Coverage was Totally Fake
-- this one seems to have been destroyed here: not fake

PSYOP Stock Footage Shown on 9/11

CNN TV Fakery Proven: Terror Drills shown as 9/11 Coverage

CNN TV Fakery: Still Photos become "exclusive video"

Loose Change working with 9/11 Perps

I must confess to not having paid much attention to Nico after the NY911 Urantia debacle. But these "media fakery" topics seem so easily destroyed by our members, I'm wondering what is behind this sudden rise in promoting them.

Have you people here had any speculative discussions on the motives for these theories?

Thanks.

absolutely terrible what they have done to you william, to have gone through what happened to you, to have seen death and destruction at every turn as you did that day, im appalled at them.
maybe they would understand if it was them it was happening to, discusting vile and feable cretins.
i wonder mate would they have exchanged places? no they would run a mile and they know it!

chin up

I feel the same way. Thank you William for what you are doing to spread the truth!

Pardon my skepticism, but are we absolutely sure this is the William Rodriguez; and how do we know?

Pardon the challenge, William, but I'm sure you understand we can never be too cautious.

he has provided more then enough clips and personal stories on this forum, im pretty sure thats its him :)

Okies. As long as at least one person is sure of it. With the multiple infiltrations of fake personalities this website has endured, I'm sure you know how important it is to confirm the identity of such an important character.

It is indeed the real William.

I see you are man enough to challenge Nico's lunacy. Yet you cower and will make no response to Mark Robert's paper on you. Why is that? What are you afraid of?

I recall a response. Did you cower behind your JREF forum and forget to check ours?

chuckles indeed.

May I remind you this is NOT A GAME!?!!?!?

I would love to read Mr. Rodriguez's response to Mr. Roberts paper. I'm curious to see what pertinent information Mr. Roberts got wrong, if any. Would you be so kind as to provide a link please?

So email William directly and ask him.

I would love to read Mr. Rodriguez's response to Mr. Roberts paper. I'm curious to see what pertinent information Mr. Roberts got wrong, if any. Would you be so kind as to provide a link please?

Do you have Mr. Rodriguez's E-Mail?

I'm making the assumption that Mr. Rodriguez responds to Nico's accusations in less than 24 hours. Yet 3 weeks after Mr. Roberts made his accusations, Mr Rodriguez remains eerily silent. Am I left to believe that Mr. Roberts was 100% right in his assessment of Mr. Rodriguez. By Mr Rodriguez's actions, and lack thereof, one must assume Mr. Roberts work was accurate.

I find Mr. Rodriguez's cowardly behavior on this matter quite frustrating. If he's ever going to be taken seriously he must answer the tough questions and answer the criticisms.

Man what have people come to? :lol:

Don't you find it odd Mr. Rodriguez IMMEDITAELY responds to Haupts attacks, while sterring clear of Roberts attacks? I just find it odd. That's all. And a tad cowardly. :ph43r:

Maybe Mr. Rodriguez will set the record staright for us today. But somehow I doubt it.

Don't you find it odd Mr. Rodriguez IMMEDITAELY responds to Haupts attacks, while sterring clear of Roberts attacks? I just find it odd. That's all. And a tad cowardly. :ph43r:

Maybe Mr. Rodriguez will set the record staright for us today. But somehow I doubt it.

wow... its obvious that you are here to cause trouble, and you agree with roberts...


Maybe William is responding because Nico's theories are widespread, and Mark Roberts is just a tourguide who is only known in these forums, and on JREF and probably as "That Creepy Guy" who no one want tours from...