Let's break this to everyone we can. We need anyone and everyone that may have voted in Sutton to come out of the woodwork.

Voter Fraud Against Paul Confirmed in Sutton, N.H

http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=655

By admin | January 8, 2008

Kurt Nimmo
Truth News
January 8, 2008

According to a post this evening on the Ron Paul Forums, vote fraud occurred in Sutton, New Hampshire:

Sutton with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton posted:
My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn’t corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???

Originally Posted by sstjean View Post
This was posted to ronpaul-801 tonight: “This town numbers are wrong wrong wrong on this map. I am from Sutton originally and my parents and one aunt all voted for Ron Paul today and Sutton says 0. So this is wrong. This is a town that had 20 people counting the ballots and I have no reason to believe that they cheated. Small town and I was born and raised there. The real numbers will come in by morning. The electronic machines in the big towns are the ones we have to worry about.”

if you compare the places where it was hand counting and computer counting, Ron Paul did well everywhere they did hand counting...

:blink:

Get the word out PLEASE!

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d5b_1199803199&c=1 - video on their site also.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=MBfmksI_wYY - video of a caller saying his family voted in Sutton for Paul. But it wasn't counted.

that is untrue, unfortunately... thare are many high percentages from machines, and many low percentages from hand-counting.

I have a database where I have compared the results up to the "C's", and I have not noticed anything very strange thus far.

I will finish it tonight and post the results.

Can they submit their story to the AP? Or do you think the media will just ignore or downplay this?

I am in UK and I listen to a BBC radio channel called 5 Live.
It does "current affairs", "sport", and they have people in the US covering the primaries, and it is interesting coverage with loads of interviews and stuff and several permanently US based English reporters.

Anyhow, they were going through all the candidates this morning and I listened out for what they were going to say about Ron Paul, after the interest shown on this forum about him.
..Turns out that "he is a very minor candidate with no chance of presidency", and according to their American commentator who was being interviewed, "all his supporters and team are geeks who can't get girlfriends".

Is this utter bias ?

More interestingly they noted that some of the minor candidates were more likely to be really pitching for Vice President than actual president, as the final candidate will need extra support from someone with a fringe interest..

Am I being fed a typical media view of things ?

Just to note, we British (who follow politics) like to follow the US election, I follow it every time but I get annoyed that I might be getting a heavily sensored view, even though at face value it does appear to be utterly honest and well presented.

your analysis seems spot on UK...

totally biased.

I don't know if there's anyone Ron Paul would run with in the GOP.

I don't think his views are compatible with any of the others.

Although a "Huckabee/Paul" ticket wouldn't be the worst thing in history... maybe paul could rub off on him some.

On AJ he just talked about flying Ron Paul into NH to make sure it gets done in time

hmm... a recount you mean? damn I hope they do it... cuz if there is a story here, and it appears that there is some fraud at least, we should expose it so that people thinking of cheating in other states or in the general election, will think twice.

A Huckabee/Paul ticket? Are you crazy bro? Huck is straight CFR; his adviser is Richard N Haass, PRESIDENT of the CFR. He scares me.

didn't know that... thanks.

That line has put a horrible thought in my head :o

damn those double entendres

sorry :(