View Full Version: The Hijackers That Are Alive?

Loose Change Forum > The Hijackers > The Hijackers That Are Alive?


Title: The Hijackers That Are Alive?
Description: Why hasn't anyone got film footage of...


PHARAOH1133 - December 22, 2007 01:28 AM (GMT)
Why hasn't anyone got any film footage of these guys, this would make for a good youtube interview, and people wpuld listen to their stories.

estrella - December 22, 2007 03:12 AM (GMT)
I agree, that is a good idea. The fact that so many of the "911 hijackers" are alive deals a serious blow to the govts story.

kissing blarney - December 22, 2007 04:45 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (PHARAOH1133 @ Dec 21 2007, 08:28 PM)
Why hasn't anyone got any film footage of these guys, this would make for a good youtube interview, and people who listen to their stories.

Kevin Barrett went on a quest this summer and came back empty handed. Doesn't mean much, but he implied he was going with a sure thing.

estrella - December 22, 2007 09:58 PM (GMT)
The only media articles I can find on this are BBC from 2001. I'm wondering if anyone knows of any more recent articles about 911 "hijackers" being alive & well.

Gideon524 - December 22, 2007 11:54 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (estrella @ Dec 22 2007, 04:58 PM)
The only media articles I can find on this are BBC from 2001. I'm wondering if anyone knows of any more recent articles about 911 "hijackers" being alive & well.

Brief mention of alive hijackers:

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...post&p=14626807

Best example of "oops, they're still alive, guys" is the Bukhari Brothers, in my humble opinion.

Have you ever heard of the Bukhari Brothers?

aired 2 days after 9/11:
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...post&p=14614344

Then there is also Abdul Rahman Al-Omari...

Aired with a week of 9/11:
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...post&p=14615557

Rusty Shackleford - December 27, 2007 01:56 AM (GMT)
I don't think we should refer to them as the "hijackers" anymore, when it's clear that the planes were controlled by radio signal and not the physical controls inside the aircraft.

Gideon524 - December 27, 2007 02:22 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Rusty Shackleford @ Dec 26 2007, 08:56 PM)
I don't think we should refer to them as the "hijackers" anymore, when it's clear that the planes were controlled by radio signal and not the physical controls inside the aircraft.

Just a little theory of mine, but I've always wondered if the only two purposes of the hijackers were to
A: leave behind evidence that Al-Qaeda/Bin Laden was involved,
and B: disable the pilots so that the plane could be hijacked from the ground.

No proof to back this up, just thought I'd throw it out there.

DCSorenson - December 28, 2007 08:12 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (PHARAOH1133 @ Dec 21 2007, 08:28 PM)
Why hasn't anyone got any film footage of these guys, this would make for a good youtube interview, and people wpuld listen to their stories.

That is an excellent question. If I were to turn on the TV and I was accused of ramming a plane into a building, I would be outraged.





* Hosted for free by InvisionFree