Title: The Mossad And The Truck Bombs Of 9/11
Terrorcell - October 9, 2007 04:59 AM (GMT)
pi3 - October 9, 2007 11:03 PM (GMT)
I always look forward to a new strawman from terrorcell.
| QUOTE |
| A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw man argument" is to create a position that is easy to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent. The position can be oversimplified, overstated, or else distorted. A straw man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it is in fact a misleading fallacy, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted. |
Terrorcell - October 10, 2007 12:55 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (pi3 @ Oct 9 2007, 11:03 PM) |
I always look forward to a new strawman from terrorcell.
| QUOTE | | A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw man argument" is to create a position that is easy to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent. The position can be oversimplified, overstated, or else distorted. A straw man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it is in fact a misleading fallacy, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted. |
|
Hi Stalker. :D
Care to "debunk" the clip or just spread more off topic disinfo?
Jennifer - October 12, 2007 06:50 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Terrorcell @ Oct 9 2007, 07:55 PM) |
| QUOTE (pi3 @ Oct 9 2007, 11:03 PM) | I always look forward to a new strawman from terrorcell.
| QUOTE | | A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw man argument" is to create a position that is easy to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent. The position can be oversimplified, overstated, or else distorted. A straw man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it is in fact a misleading fallacy, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted. |
|
Hi Stalker. :D
Care to "debunk" the clip or just spread more off topic disinfo?
|
Aha... this is the guy.
I love Reichstag. If you would only get off your lazy ass and finish it, Portland would be enjoying copies far and wide.
Terrorcell - October 15, 2007 09:43 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Jennifer @ Oct 12 2007, 06:50 AM) |
| QUOTE (Terrorcell @ Oct 9 2007, 07:55 PM) | | QUOTE (pi3 @ Oct 9 2007, 11:03 PM) | I always look forward to a new strawman from terrorcell.
| QUOTE | | A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw man argument" is to create a position that is easy to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent. The position can be oversimplified, overstated, or else distorted. A straw man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it is in fact a misleading fallacy, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted. |
|
Hi Stalker. :D
Care to "debunk" the clip or just spread more off topic disinfo?
|
Aha... this is the guy.
I love Reichstag. If you would only get off your lazy ass and finish it, Portland would be enjoying copies far and wide.
|
I do have part II remastered now. It took 2 discs to do it though.
I can't believe over 160 views and no one has anything negative or positive to say about this footage?
Terrorcell - November 5, 2007 02:26 AM (GMT)
No one has anything to say about this presentation?
Arbor - November 5, 2007 02:57 AM (GMT)
Is any of this information new? How many more posts are there gonna be that rehash the same thing..again and again and again?
5 dancing Jews doing the Hora on a white van, white van at the GWB that doesnt explode, white van in Manhattan that explodes..with no witnesses, debree, or damage.
bla bla bla. Johnny one note.
Terrorcell - November 19, 2007 02:54 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Arbor @ Nov 5 2007, 02:57 AM) |
Is any of this information new? How many more posts are there gonna be that rehash the same thing..again and again and again?
5 dancing Jews doing the Hora on a white van, white van at the GWB that doesnt explode, white van in Manhattan that explodes..with no witnesses, debree, or damage.
bla bla bla. Johnny one note. |
yeah you're right. israeli's kill americans, who cares? go israel!!!
Arbor - November 20, 2007 09:45 PM (GMT)
Israelis didnt kill anyone. Thats why no one is responding to these posts, which get repeated again and again.
Not only is the "the Zionists did 9-11" bad for the Truth Movemant, but its also stupid, dumb, and boring.
Whenever something bad happens someone always wants to blaim Israel. From the tsunami in 2005, to the levee failure in New Orleans, to the terror attacks in Bali.
It is only a reflection of the maturity and intelligence of the folks in this forum that they pay no mind to this bullshit.
JackD - November 21, 2007 12:45 AM (GMT)
of course, the Israeli armed forces, and their intelligence affiliates, have never killed Americans. Even the survivors of the June 8, 1967 Liberty attack know that!
http://www.ussliberty.org/report/report.htmYet, even though the Israeli government claims it
was at that point that they offered help, never firing at us again after the torpedo
explosion, this is not so. Almost every man on that ship recalls -- as I personally recall
very clearly from my position outside the wardroom -- that the torpedo boats then circled
the ship for a long time firing at close range at anything that moved. Men trying to aid
their wounded shipmates on deck were fired upon. Men fighting fires were fired upon
and recall seeing their fire hoses punctured by machinegun fire. This went on for
several minutes. At one point the boatmen concentrated their fire near the waterline
amidships, presumably hoping to
Arbor - November 21, 2007 01:24 AM (GMT)
Yes. Israel did indeed fire on the Liberty and kill American soldiers. Ofcourse the Liberty was an intelligence vessel spying on Israel during time of war, but thats no excuse.
Terrorcell - December 26, 2007 05:15 AM (GMT)
