View Full Version: What City Is The Safer One, Or Safest Cities,ya'll

Loose Change Forum > Polls, Votes, Petitions, Surveys > What City Is The Safer One, Or Safest Cities,ya'll


Title: What City Is The Safer One, Or Safest Cities,ya'll
Description: cities maybe that won't blow up


betty - July 29, 2007 09:08 PM (GMT)
What do ya'll think about this?? :)))

Alliednations - July 30, 2007 02:57 AM (GMT)
Technically, they're all in danger. If the government was behind 9/11, then all U.S. cities are doomed. If the terrorists did it, then they could easily infiltrate that city and blow it up. Both ways, we're doomed. However, if the government DID NOT do anything, and is actually telling the truth that 9/11 was a terrorist attack, then we are safer, than from a conspiracy theorists point of view. Can anyone prove me wrong? A good debater learns from mistakes. Mistakes fuel conspiracy theorists.

Remian - July 30, 2007 04:10 AM (GMT)
I don't really like this poll. As a joke I'd say Houston or Austin because...why would they blow up the acting President's land of glory. But then again, seriously, I'd say New York. They wouldn't attack the same place twice in such a short timespan...but then again...I think we're all in danger.

SPreston - July 31, 2007 05:22 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (betty)
What City Is The Safer One, Or Safest Cities,ya'll
What do ya'll think about this?? :)))

QUOTE (Remian)
I don't really like this poll. As a joke I'd say Houston or Austin because...why would they blow up the acting President's land of glory. But then again, seriously, I'd say New York. They wouldn't attack the same place twice in such a short timespan...but then again...I think we're all in danger.

I did not bother to vote because an important ingredient was left out; namely Which cities do not have skyscrapers insured for 'terrorist attacks' by Larry Silverstein? That seems to be an important consideration, so offhand I would say for now stay out of Chicago and New York. The Bush Regime desperately needs another 'terrorist attack' so perhaps small towns would make better choices for residence. By they you surely don't mean the same old patsies from the first round, or do you? B)

abcd - July 31, 2007 07:03 PM (GMT)
Democratic states and Anti-war states more likely to hit

Example -NY, SF, DC etc

Remian - July 31, 2007 10:02 PM (GMT)
Now that I think about it, dead children would be good pro-war propaganda =/

abcd - August 1, 2007 09:58 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Remian @ Jul 31 2007, 10:02 PM)
Now that I think about it, dead children would be good pro-war propaganda =/

Incidentally, Sr Bush ralied the first Iraq war by claiming Saddams govt killed incubator babies.


Video - Sr Bush Lies about dead babies to rally 1st Iraq war

OR

Google "incubator babies iraq bush"

SPreston - August 2, 2007 03:18 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (abcd)
QUOTE (Remian)
QUOTE (Remian)
Now that I think about it, dead children would be good pro-war propaganda =/

Incidentally, Sr Bush ralied the first Iraq war by claiming Saddams govt killed incubator babies.


Video - Sr Bush Lies about dead babies to rally 1st Iraq war

OR

Google "incubator babies iraq bush"

To be honest, murdered and raped and roasted with Napalm little Iraqi children hasn't done too well for Baby Bush this time around. B) :rolleyes:

user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image

Real US Casualty Figures in Iraq - Echoes of Vietnam
http://www.flying-dragon.com/resistance/B2...1416/index.html




Hosted for free by zIFBoards