View Full Version: Another Great Research From Nico...not!

Loose Change Forum > The Lounge > Another Great Research From Nico...not!

Pages: [1] 2 3 4

Title: Another Great Research From Nico...not!
Description: he just earn my "agent" side


William_Rodriguez - June 5, 2007 01:01 PM (GMT)
Hi fellows, I guess with the strings of attention lately and wannabe researchers just dying to get me in the frucus to make a name for themselves, the latest is Nica trying its hand on attacking me.

http://www.911researchers.com/node/555

I learned from his research that I was an "agent" and handled by the same government I am attacking. The paper is so ridiculous that even goes to the Chroma Key bullshit of Johaneman being also superimposed on the news.

then you get your incitators around claiming that I should not attack their theories after they attack my experience. Notice how idiotic his paper and how he gets everything wrong except about my media contacts. He even got the wrong Salvatore Giambanco!!!!
"Good news for all of you there. I have 3 Giambanco interviews that will be included in the new DVD and also will be digitized for you tube"

This no-planers are getting really on my bad side and nope, again you are wrong Nica, I am far from Jesus like.

William

look-up - June 5, 2007 01:34 PM (GMT)
Stand tall William. We got your back, sir!

William_Rodriguez - June 5, 2007 01:38 PM (GMT)
Thank you!!

chucksheen - June 5, 2007 05:13 PM (GMT)
:blink:

QUOTE
Free Paris Hilton!

Arrest:  Loose Change 9/11

and

Keymaster William Rodriguez


There are so many truly disgusting, evil, occultish criminals out there and they choose to focus on this? Seems like counter intelligence and counter intuitive to me. What a shame. Who is next to be attacked and targeted by the truth movement? Shure? Sibel Edmonds? Maybe there should be a face to face meeting of everyone involved to squash this?

911wasaninsidejob - June 5, 2007 05:14 PM (GMT)
Don't worry man, most people don't take him seriously, and MANY people take you seriously. You're a great man and they are nothing compared to you man, you're a hero. Keep on and don't worry about the haters...

SkepticOverlord - June 5, 2007 05:36 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (William_Rodriguez @ Jun 5 2007, 08:01 AM)
This no-planers are getting really on my bad side and nope, again you are wrong Nica, I am far from Jesus like.

Hi William...

There appears to be a sudden "push" in no-plane "TV Fakery" theories which trace their origins back to Nico Haupt. Over the past 3-4 days, we've been hit with some highly passionate posts promoting these theories:

ABC Live 911 Coverage was Totally Fake
-- this one seems to have been destroyed here: not fake

PSYOP Stock Footage Shown on 9/11

CNN TV Fakery Proven: Terror Drills shown as 9/11 Coverage

CNN TV Fakery: Still Photos become "exclusive video"

Loose Change working with 9/11 Perps

I must confess to not having paid much attention to Nico after the NY911 Urantia debacle. But these "media fakery" topics seem so easily destroyed by our members, I'm wondering what is behind this sudden rise in promoting them.

Have you people here had any speculative discussions on the motives for these theories?

Thanks.

Waxem - June 5, 2007 05:47 PM (GMT)
absolutely terrible what they have done to you william, to have gone through what happened to you, to have seen death and destruction at every turn as you did that day, im appalled at them.
maybe they would understand if it was them it was happening to, discusting vile and feable cretins.
i wonder mate would they have exchanged places? no they would run a mile and they know it!

chin up

truthisgood - June 5, 2007 07:15 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (look-up @ Jun 5 2007, 01:34 PM)
Stand tall William.  We got your back, sir!

I feel the same way. Thank you William for what you are doing to spread the truth!

Regnibrah - June 5, 2007 07:23 PM (GMT)
Pardon my skepticism, but are we absolutely sure this is the William Rodriguez; and how do we know?

Pardon the challenge, William, but I'm sure you understand we can never be too cautious.

ross11988 - June 5, 2007 07:28 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Regnibrah @ Jun 5 2007, 07:23 PM)
Pardon my skepticism, but are we absolutely sure this is the William Rodriguez; and how do we know?

Pardon the challenge, William, but I'm sure you understand we can never be too cautious.

he has provided more then enough clips and personal stories on this forum, im pretty sure thats its him :)

Regnibrah - June 5, 2007 07:32 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (ross11988 @ Jun 5 2007, 02:28 PM)
he has provided more then enough clips and personal stories on this forum, im pretty sure thats its him :)

Okies. As long as at least one person is sure of it. With the multiple infiltrations of fake personalities this website has endured, I'm sure you know how important it is to confirm the identity of such an important character.

IVXX - June 5, 2007 07:34 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Regnibrah @ Jun 5 2007, 02:23 PM)
Pardon my skepticism, but are we absolutely sure this is the William Rodriguez; and how do we know?

It is indeed the real William.

chuckles - June 5, 2007 08:17 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (William_Rodriguez @ Jun 5 2007, 08:01 AM)
Hi fellows, I guess with the strings of attention lately and wannabe researchers just dying to get me in the frucus to make a name for themselves, the latest is Nica trying its hand on attacking me.

http://www.911researchers.com/node/555

I learned from his research that I was an "agent" and handled by the same government I am attacking. The paper is so ridiculous that even goes to the Chroma Key bullshit of Johaneman being also superimposed on the news.

then you get your incitators around claiming that I should not attack their theories after they attack my experience. Notice how idiotic his paper and how he gets everything wrong except about my media contacts. He even got the wrong Salvatore Giambanco!!!!
"Good news for all of you there. I have 3 Giambanco interviews that will be included in the new DVD and also will be digitized for you tube"

This no-planers are getting really on my bad side and nope, again you are wrong Nica, I am far from Jesus like.

William

I see you are man enough to challenge Nico's lunacy. Yet you cower and will make no response to Mark Robert's paper on you. Why is that? What are you afraid of?

look-up - June 5, 2007 08:19 PM (GMT)
I recall a response. Did you cower behind your JREF forum and forget to check ours?

chuckles indeed.

May I remind you this is NOT A GAME!?!!?!?

chuckles - June 5, 2007 08:22 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (look-up @ Jun 5 2007, 03:19 PM)
I recall a response. Did you cower behind your JREF forum and forget to check ours?

chuckles indeed.

May I remind you this is NOT A GAME!?!!?!?

I would love to read Mr. Rodriguez's response to Mr. Roberts paper. I'm curious to see what pertinent information Mr. Roberts got wrong, if any. Would you be so kind as to provide a link please?

IVXX - June 5, 2007 08:43 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (chuckles @ Jun 5 2007, 03:22 PM)
I would love to read Mr. Rodriguez's response to Mr. Roberts paper. I'm curious to see what pertinent information Mr. Roberts got wrong, if any. Would you be so kind as to provide a link please?

So email William directly and ask him.

chuckles - June 5, 2007 08:48 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (chuckles @ Jun 5 2007, 03:22 PM)
QUOTE (look-up @ Jun 5 2007, 03:19 PM)
I recall a response.  Did you cower behind your JREF forum and forget to check ours?

chuckles indeed.

May I remind you this is NOT A GAME!?!!?!?

I would love to read Mr. Rodriguez's response to Mr. Roberts paper. I'm curious to see what pertinent information Mr. Roberts got wrong, if any. Would you be so kind as to provide a link please?

Do you have Mr. Rodriguez's E-Mail?

I'm making the assumption that Mr. Rodriguez responds to Nico's accusations in less than 24 hours. Yet 3 weeks after Mr. Roberts made his accusations, Mr Rodriguez remains eerily silent. Am I left to believe that Mr. Roberts was 100% right in his assessment of Mr. Rodriguez. By Mr Rodriguez's actions, and lack thereof, one must assume Mr. Roberts work was accurate.

I find Mr. Rodriguez's cowardly behavior on this matter quite frustrating. If he's ever going to be taken seriously he must answer the tough questions and answer the criticisms.

Revolutionary91 - June 5, 2007 08:51 PM (GMT)
Man what have people come to? :lol:

chuckles - June 5, 2007 08:55 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Revolutionary91 @ Jun 5 2007, 03:51 PM)
Man what have people come to? :lol:

Don't you find it odd Mr. Rodriguez IMMEDITAELY responds to Haupts attacks, while sterring clear of Roberts attacks? I just find it odd. That's all. And a tad cowardly. :ph43r:

Maybe Mr. Rodriguez will set the record staright for us today. But somehow I doubt it.

stopsnitchin - June 5, 2007 09:00 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (chuckles @ Jun 5 2007, 08:55 PM)
QUOTE (Revolutionary91 @ Jun 5 2007, 03:51 PM)
Man what have people come to? :lol:

Don't you find it odd Mr. Rodriguez IMMEDITAELY responds to Haupts attacks, while sterring clear of Roberts attacks? I just find it odd. That's all. And a tad cowardly. :ph43r:

Maybe Mr. Rodriguez will set the record staright for us today. But somehow I doubt it.

wow... its obvious that you are here to cause trouble, and you agree with roberts...


Maybe William is responding because Nico's theories are widespread, and Mark Roberts is just a tourguide who is only known in these forums, and on JREF and probably as "That Creepy Guy" who no one want tours from...

IVXX - June 5, 2007 09:11 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (chuckles @ Jun 5 2007, 03:48 PM)
QUOTE (chuckles @ Jun 5 2007, 03:22 PM)
QUOTE (look-up @ Jun 5 2007, 03:19 PM)
I recall a response.  Did you cower behind your JREF forum and forget to check ours?

chuckles indeed.

May I remind you this is NOT A GAME!?!!?!?

I would love to read Mr. Rodriguez's response to Mr. Roberts paper. I'm curious to see what pertinent information Mr. Roberts got wrong, if any. Would you be so kind as to provide a link please?

Do you have Mr. Rodriguez's E-Mail?

I'm making the assumption that Mr. Rodriguez responds to Nico's accusations in less than 24 hours. Yet 3 weeks after Mr. Roberts made his accusations, Mr Rodriguez remains eerily silent. Am I left to believe that Mr. Roberts was 100% right in his assessment of Mr. Rodriguez. By Mr Rodriguez's actions, and lack thereof, one must assume Mr. Roberts work was accurate.

I find Mr. Rodriguez's cowardly behavior on this matter quite frustrating. If he's ever going to be taken seriously he must answer the tough questions and answer the criticisms.

Go to http://william911.com and you'll find direct contact info for him. Email him for a response before you assume anything. You call William cowardly yet you make accusations behind an anonymous screen name.

stopsnitchin - June 5, 2007 09:20 PM (GMT)
I'm leaving this respons here incase william reads through the thread,

you should just ignore people who claim everyone is an agent, those are that people that I'm suspicious of.

You saved numerous lives on 9/11, Nicos fame is that he out schwasticas in a church taht had a NY9/11 Truth meeting. And Mark Roberts is a tour guide. Just ignore them and keep doing what your doing...

BTW, that Paris hilton video was so crazy it was sorta funny in a way... :P

George Hayduke - June 6, 2007 02:16 PM (GMT)
Is Will Rodriguez a "magician"?

George Hayduke - June 6, 2007 02:32 PM (GMT)
Wow Will, if any of this checks out, it might be a good idea if we keep you out of the inner circle until we figure some things out about you.

QUOTE
Recently it has been revealed that Rodriguez apparently also sabotaged an appearance of Professor Judy Wood into "TheView" (Rosie O'Donnell).
He also leaked misinformation about Charlie Sheen to the NY POST, by claiming Sheen was booked as a narrator of 'Loose Change FC' which happened to be in the same protest week when O'Donnell received a DVD on evidence of 9/11 TV Fakery.
Sheen actually denied the claim he was officially booked by Loose Change, but also didn't rule out he wasn't interested.
Rodriguez was also part of a dog and pony show between him and Alex "Scientology" Jones about this leak, who claimed that this was treated as some secret marketing gig.
Let's summarize on Rodriguez:

...

William Rodriguez confirmed in his own bio, that he was actually working as an "assistant" for MindOP specialist James Randi.
Rodriguez used the stage name "Roudy", still part of his email handle.
Randi's JREF Forum is meanwhile organizing 'flagwaver' attacks against the 9/11 Truthlings, mostly influenced by 911truth.org, 911blogger.com and LooseChange.
According to Scoop.nz, Rodriguez used to work for Governor Cuomo, which helped him to become a high ranking janitor on the twin towers building, though he never explained why he was supposed to be the only janitor in a 50,000 employees complex.


On Governor Cuomo: For those who haven't researched this guy, Cuomo ran HUD when it was being used by the CIA to launder profits from CIA-run crack-houses in South Los Angeles. During this time HUD laundered billions used to fund illegal proxy wars around the world and to futher the intelligence sect-run drug trade, which put tons upon tons of crack cocaine on inner-city streets and guns into the hands of kids.

I know it's important to rally around our whistle blowers, but this guy is like the BYU physicist who used to run exotic weaponry development programs for Los Alamos Nat. Labs who wants everyone to believe it was thermite that brought down the WTC. It's good to have them aboard. But keep them at arm's length until we are certain about their background and intentions.

bart - June 6, 2007 03:05 PM (GMT)
Good job William! Keep up the good work!

look-up - June 6, 2007 03:07 PM (GMT)
I am certain about William Rodriguez's and Steven Jones' intentions. It's unfair to associate them with potential disinfo unless you have more than just their previous affiliations to back it up.

Ever heard of a change of heart?

j911ob - June 6, 2007 03:33 PM (GMT)
For everyones convenience I will list the disinfo people:

1) Everybody on 911researchers.com
2) David Shayler

The end.

George Hayduke - June 6, 2007 03:34 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
It's unfair to associate them with potential disinfo unless you have more than just their previous affiliations to back it up.


Fine, but let that be the standard for everyone, including Haupt.

If Haupt and Rodriguez wanna go head to head and take their disciples with them into the fray, then maybe both are agents, here to divide the movement, to explode it from within.

And goddamnit it's important to know if Rodriguez was a magician, if he worked for this mind-war, mind control dude and if he's on the inside of Cuomo's circle. That's important to know.

Lookup, I'd recommend you not affiliate yourself with any one particular TM figurehead. We're not pulling for baseball teams here. A brief look at the handling and neutralization of the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement shows that the FBI infiltrated both movements to their top operational tiers and in many cases the majority of the leaders of those organizations were either spooks or had been compromised. That's fact.

Now I appreciate what Will's done. But at the same time, if there is any truth to what Haupt says then maybe it's time we reconsider the status we are giving him in this movement.

And one more thing, it's bullshit to call someone disinfo because they are exploring ideas that scare you or you don't agree with. NPT/NBBT/CGI, even if totally false, encourage people to explore important lines of thought into exotic weaponry and technology and the secret programs run by the gov't that create and further them. That's important. That's vital. These ideas must be explored if we are to be enabled with the information we need to build a better world. People shutting down certain lines of inquiry need to think it through; are we going after people for committing certain "thought crimes?" Are we watering down 911T so the fat lazy middle of America can get on board? I'm not so sure we want or need them on board. They've never accomplished a damn thing and we know for a fact that it is that exact sect of the population that is a huge part of the problem!

George Hayduke - June 6, 2007 03:36 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (j911ob @ Jun 6 2007, 03:33 PM)
2) David Shayler

That's new to me. Care to share your reasoning?

j911ob - June 6, 2007 03:39 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (George Hayduke @ Jun 6 2007, 03:36 PM)
QUOTE (j911ob @ Jun 6 2007, 03:33 PM)
2) David Shayler

That's new to me. Care to share your reasoning?

Very simple. He worked for MI5 and he went on national radio in britain saying the planes were cartoons.

George Hayduke - June 6, 2007 03:44 PM (GMT)
So what? I don't get it. He's entitled to his opinion, isn't he? I mean footage is like Rosarch's ink blots; it's been effectively proven that everybody sees something different in it.

If you don't trust him that's your perogative and you are definitely entitled to it and I respect that. Don't elect him to office; don't put him in charge.

But to call him an agent and a disinfo agent because you don't agree with what he said is bullshit and I think you might need to reflect on why you are here and what the TM can and should accomplish.

You guys, you "who-is-the-mole" alarmists are playing into their hands. You're doing what they do, what the people you want to see stripped from power do. You are persecuting folks for thought crime. And you are overlooking very important information so you can further ideas that you are grasping that aren't necessarily 100 percent bulletproof.

j911ob - June 6, 2007 03:53 PM (GMT)
And what exactly will the truth movement achieve when well known people can go on national media and say the planes that hit the world trade centre are cartoons?

You do know its getting worse now dont you? People like fetzer are saying that the footage of the buildings was fake. I have had enough of this crap. They can say what they like in private but when they try to represent me with that crap then its out of order.

look-up - June 6, 2007 04:12 PM (GMT)
Well William is a hero by his acts on 9/11 alone. That does it for me.

QUOTE
Lookup, I'd recommend you not affiliate yourself with any one particular TM figurehead. We're not pulling for baseball teams here. A brief look at the handling and neutralization of the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement shows that the FBI infiltrated both movements to their top operational tiers and in many cases the majority of the leaders of those organizations were either spooks or had been compromised. That's fact.


I haven't affiliated myself with anyone. We are a part of a political reformation, to say the least. It is natural for different opposing ideas to emerge in the process. The opposing views don't need to assume the other is disinfo or compromised in any way, necessarily. But of course disinfo is real and movements throughout history have been infiltrated.

This one probably is infiltrated in one way or another. But accusing everyone is playing right into their hands.

George Hayduke - June 6, 2007 04:16 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (j911ob @ Jun 6 2007, 03:53 PM)
They can say what they like in private but when they try to represent me with that crap then its out of order.

This isn't about you and they don't represent you; nor do they represent the movement of the truth.

The truth stands on it's own, people. It doesn't need a representative. It doesn't need a spokesperson.

Further, the extent to which a society is democratic is the extent to which its marketplace of ideas is unregulated. By trying to marginalize a person's comments you are in effect limiting the scope of the marketplace of ideas.

There is something very basic you all are missing here. For a person to believe 911 was an inside job they must first believe that the government is capable of such a thing. This is the gateway, that belief.

If a person believes that the government cannot and will not do such a thing, then they will never, and I mean never until their dying day, join the Truth Movement. You can show them pictures of skyscrapers being blown to kingdom come, pictures of the incredibly small hole in the side of the Pentagon, pictures of NORAD folk engaged in hijacking exercises, and they will never believe you.

Now once you cross that threshold, then it is a whole new ballgame. Then you are open to certain ideas, one of which states that no planes, or no big Boeings were used on 911.

Now on this note I will say that to this day, after a couple of years in the TM, I have not once, not ever and don't ever expect a person to say, "I cannot embrace 911T because of what Morgan Reynolds is saying." Never have I heard a person say, "You know I might actually support the TM if it weren't for the no-planers." Never has anyone ever said that, as far as I can tell.

Truthers usually suit up in one camp or another, yes. But as far as I can tell, once you are on board, there is no going back. And to get on board you have to first be open to certain things. If you are closed to those things, if you are closed to the idea that the gov't is capable of bombing it's own people and blaming its enemies, then you will not ever embrace 911T.

And we don't want you. If you think the gov't is your buddy, here to help, here to serve the people, then you are so far gone anyway that we can't help you; we have nothing for you.

You dig?

George Hayduke - June 6, 2007 04:24 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (look-up @ Jun 6 2007, 04:12 PM)
But of course disinfo is real and movements throughout history have been infiltrated.

Right. So playing "who-is-the-mole" is a waste of time. I say presume that if the person is powerful within the movement, then they're a mole! There. That's all you need to know. Now does that mean we have to close camp. Not at all. Because a movement is much more than it's leaders. Leaders can be bought, sold, compromised, neutralized, killed. Ideas are bulletproof.

This thread is a great example. In his article, Haupt puts forward ideas for discussion. Is Rodriguez a magician? Did he work with a psy/mind war-op? Is he in Cuomo's inner circle?

These ideas are pertinent for a variety of reasons, especially now that Rosie's been destroyed and it is questionable about whether or not Chuck's to narrate LCFC. But have they been addressed?

No. Instead we're divided again into plane-huggers vs. the NPT-loonies. In fact that was the point of the thread. Haupt is a NPT-loonie and agent, Rodriguez says. Everyone jumps on board to save their hero, Rodriguez and nobody reads about how he probably is on the rapid-dial list of a CIA drug money-launderer.

Come on, guys. We aren't pulling for ball teams. This isn't a horse race, Haupt vs. Rodriguez. But if you let them get their way it will become a horse race. It will become a fight, not amongst our patsy leaders, but amongst us, the real truthers, the real Americans who want truth and justice. We'll be divided so we can be ruled.

NickJ1234 - June 6, 2007 04:56 PM (GMT)
I always thought of willie as a profound man, a person with courage, and a huge ally in the movement. And still do. But id be lieing if i said I didnt find it suspicious that Will was in some way connected to James Randi. that forum is probably considered the biggest infultrator to one of the most prominent 9/11 truth forums on the net. I just cant wrap my head around why a man of his status and backround could possibly be in any form of past association with a cult ment to discredit us.

And is it true that Will was in Cuomo's inner circle? if so, given my views on how vital it is to expose the war on drugs

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...showtopic=10448

i will have my doubts. hate to say this, but i think it would be a good idea if we continue to question Wills status in this movement until we figure out what the hell is really going on. I am NOT jumping to conclusions, attempting to discredit in anyway. but we would be fools not to atleast look into this further.

William_Rodriguez - June 6, 2007 07:05 PM (GMT)
I see you have been busy while I was away.
1: I did work for the Executive Chamber as a janitor for 10 years while Cuomo was the Governor. I got the job in 1982 after I did a magic show to welcome him at the new offices on the 57floor, South Tower. I say on my video that god prepares you on strange ways because while working there, I learned how to be like a polititian. I will st up the Press Conferences with my co-worker Richard and also attend to meetings to clean up and tend to the bagels and coffee. Cuomo liked me as a person and I have access to the whole office. No surprise here, that is how I was able to help my community afterwards.

2: I do not represent the 9/11 Truth Movement. I am not the leader and I was not aware there were any. I am the President of the Hispanic Victmins Group, on the board of directors of the 9/11 United Services Group and many other organizations. I do not speak for anybody out there except the victims, the survivors and those affected by the tragedy. I tell my story and pinpoint many of the failures on the investigation. I do not need or want followers. I want people who help and do the right thing for those affected.

3. I met Randi in 1976, in a Magician Convention and at that time I had a TV show for children's in Puerto Rico. I interviewd him for that. After that I wrote at the age of 17, a TV Show called, Carlos Busquets y su Mundo- again in Puerto Rico, dealing with phenomena. I did 2 specials about the psychic Surgery healers in the Phillipines. Trained by Randi on how to perform it. I still have the videos. I helped Randi on a tour around Europe and it was well documented on his book "Flim Flam- The truth about Parapsycholy and other Dellusions", after that , I lost contact for several years and then again connected with him to investigate a Tv evangelist named WV Grant in Brooklyn, also this is documented in his book " The Faith Healers". After that, lost contact for almost 8 years, after 9/11. He did'nt remember that I worked there and felt very bad about it. We never talked about the events and this was always phone comunication. We saw each other after more than 13 years I believe, when the death of Johnny Carson- In NYC for 10 minutes because he was doing an appeareance on Access Hollywood. Again, we never talked about the events or my experience. When he found out I was going to Venezuela from the news, he called to advise me not to go. I went any way.
I have offered him a pow-wow in the future just to talk about this and he agreed.
His JREF forum, is not controlled by him and as a courtesy, they put a disclaimer were they states that the Randi foundation do not endorse any of the forum vies and do not want anybody to make claims that they represent the Randi foundation. Go over there and read it.

3. I have appeared on many events with people that have included the no-planes bullshit. It is their beliefs, but once I find out, I disassociate from them. Research that and you will find it.

4. I am in the No-fly list, I have been investigated, I have been vilified from BOTH sides and at the end, this is my mission, movement or not, to find out what really happened. By default I have done more to bring out answers than many of my detractors COMBINED. Many fail to even approach my work in the Hispanic community, there is were I find my many successes in helping. Those issues are never presented.

5. I recieved an average of 7,000 emails a day. I cannot answer all of them but I try. Some of them do not even deserve an answer because they are so redundant, and they lack the efoorts to search for the answers themselves.
But others are so misinfo, that I take my time to address them as much as possible.

6. Question people? Heck I do that all the time, but with valid research and with a direct contact. Not with attacks first and speculations.

7. Why I do not answer Mark Roberts? because it is a compendium of personal speculations on his part and an effort destroy my efforts. I received more support after his piece, and engagements from all over. As a matter of fact, we are putting many of his things on a new video. In a way he made the work easier because we can adress them directly on my presentations. I just booked the WHOLE summer in EUROPE and I am leaving this Friday. If I spent my time answering every attacker, it will stop me from doing the amount of work I do out there and the outreach. You remember in this forum the efforts from a looser with a 2 cents TV show to engage me one way or the other. I do not need anybody making a name for themselves with me. I do that on my own.

8. Many people get uneasy about my approach and my website and accuse me of trying to exploit my status. All I need to say is that I use the same techniques of all the polititians out there. Fire with fire. I learned from them and just go and type any political figure, go to their website and that is exactly what you wil find.

9. Many accused me of exploting 9/11. I am 9/11! Those idiots have not researched that I was in fact homeless, after helping so many victims. I survive on donations and tthe sale of the dvd on my presentations. Barely making a living.
Tell that to Giuliani who's firm and him made over 100 million dollars.

Hope this answers some of the questions.
William


George Hayduke - June 6, 2007 07:21 PM (GMT)
It definitely goes a long way towards getting more information out there on some of the subjects Haupt brings up. And it is much appreciated.

Now dig this. Haupt also asserts:

QUOTE
1) Recently it has been revealed that Rodriguez apparently also sabotaged an appearance of Professor Judy Wood into "TheView" (Rosie O'Donnell).
2) He also leaked misinformation about Charlie Sheen to the NY POST, by claiming Sheen was booked as a narrator of 'Loose Change FC' which happened to be in the same protest week when O'Donnell received a DVD on evidence of 9/11 TV Fakery.
Sheen actually denied the claim he was officially booked by Loose Change, but also didn't rule out he wasn't interested.


Could you address these statements?

NK-44 - June 6, 2007 07:29 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
9. Many accused me of exploting 9/11. I am 9/11! Those idiots have not researched that I was in fact homeless, after helping so many victims. I survive on donations and tthe sale of the dvd on my presentations. Barely making a living.
Tell that to Giuliani who's firm and him made over 100 million dollars.


yes that's very true. how many people were rescued by Giuliani?
instead, the decisions he made leading to 9/11 (radios) and on that day (confusing rescue efforts) prevented people from beeing rescued.

and though he is responsible for the death of a number of people, he not only made millions out of their deaths, but still has the audacity to exploit 9/11 (and his complete failure) for his presidental campaign.

why doesn't some jrfer make a paper about Giuliani? i know why, they never play fair.


btw, welcome to this forum, Willie. :)

Citizen Pawn - June 6, 2007 07:52 PM (GMT)
1) The 911 Truth Movement has been compromised

2) Be careful of who you accuse of being a spy, mole, disinfo agent, shill.

3) The 911 Truth Movement has been compromised.

4) If you underestimate your opponents, you have failed the most basic law of warfare.

5) The very people you call "shills" might be the very people that are working hard to save your ass, the fact that you disagree with them or think all of their views are without merit, WONT STOP THAT.

6) Truth is not a destination, it's a path.

7) The 911 Truth Movement has been compromised.

8) Those with egos or "look at what I've done" attitudes, should always be suspect.

9) Truth does not boast of it's "accomplishments", truth is self evident and needs NO MAN to validate it.

10) You will never know "the truth", you will get close, you will catch a glimpse, but in the end, truth will escape us all. Only the Universe holds truth, men do not and CANNOT.

11) Everyone in the 911 Truth Movement holds a PIECE of truth and a PIECE of the lie. No man or woman in this movement can escape that. Truth is a path not a destination.

12) The 911 Truth Movement has been severely compromised.




Hosted for free by zIFBoards