Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Learn More · Register Now
Learn More · Register Now
| QUOTE |
| THE CANCER CON. By Chris Spivey – Sovereign Independent Contributor Sometime last year i read a statistic about Cancer that left me totally gob smacked! The statistic dealt with the drastic increase in numbers of those likely to be affected by Cancer throughout the 20th century. The figures given were that in 1900, around 1 in 100 people were affected by Cancer. By the 1950′s that figured had increased to 1 in 10 before rapidly rising again to a staggering 1 in 3 by the year 2000. Obviously a lot of the increase between 1900 and 1950, can in theory, be explained away by the average life expectancy being a lot lower during that period and no doubt the two world wars also had a bearing on the figures. However, even reducing that number by a generous 75 % will still give you a figure rising from 1 in 25 to 1 in 10 during that period. A staggering increase by any standards! By the 1950′s life expectancy had increased sharply and with the absence of any world wars the rise from 1 in 10 to 1 in 3 by the year 2000 isn’t so easily explained away. To further fan the flames, statistics released in 2011 suggest that 48% of people will now be affected by cancer at some point in their life. That means that in just over a decade, the already alarming 1 in 3 has risen to nearly 1 in 2. If you apply that figure to the average family of 2 adults and 2 children, it’s hardly surprising people rush to the Doctors at the drop of a hat. Between 1950 and the Millennium the incidence of all types of Cancer rose a staggering 85%. Moreover this statistic is based on the age adjusted rate. In other words, the increase has nothing to do with people living longer. Further proof of this is evidenced by the fact that over the 2 decades leading up to the year 2000, the fastest growing rate of Cancer for any age group was that found in children. Furthermore, there has been a major shift in the type of Cancer people are developing. For instance, Breast Cancer now affects 1 in 3 women and accounts for the highest number of deaths in female cancer patients. However, during the first half of the last century cases of Breast Cancer were virtually non-existent. Once again, this can’t be explained away by the fact that life expectancy was so much lower between, 1900-1950 since breast cancer is common amongst relatively young women. Similarly, Testicular Cancer, although still fairly uncommon has seen the biggest increase in numbers of all the other cancer types more commonly found in men. Once again, Testicular cancer is almost exclusively found in younger men, especially within the 15 -35 year old age group. Further contradictions can be found contained within the numbers when you consider the improvement in working conditions. The laws on Health and Safety in the workplace became much more stringent and rigorously enforced during the second half of the 20th century. Gone were the days of working in factories and mills where the air was thick with cancer giving particles. The latter half of the century also saw the banning of asbestos which at one time inevitably lead to those who worked with it developing Asbestosis, a form of Lung Cancer. Interestingly enough, cancers who’s development are specifically linked to Cigarette smoking, such as lung cancer, only account for a Quarter of all Cancer related deaths.. This is despite the fact that people smoked in far greater numbers up until the mid, 1960s’. It is only after this time that number of people who smoked, slowly started to fall So no matter how you massage the figures, there is still an enormous leap in the number of people getting cancer. Worse still the trend is showing no sign of slowing down. That is to say the trend is showing no sign of slowing down for the vast majority of us. For the social elite however, cancer is an entirely different story. While the statistics point to 1 in 3 of us developing cancer, when is the last time you heard of a member of the Royal family getting Cancer? The Queen mother lived well past the 100 mark. The Queen & Prince Phillip are still going strong. There’s not many 90 year olds’ still competing in equestrian events I’ll wager. Charles, Anne, Andrew and Edward haven’t had Cancer. Neither have the 8 Grandchildren. Suffice to say then that the Royal family don’t even fall into the 1 in 10 category of the 1950s’ however it isn’t just Royalty that are seemingly immune to Cancer. It’s very rare indeed that you ever hear of anyone with power, influence and money being affected. Stranger still, even when the superrich are unlucky enough to be blighted by the curse of the common man, the rule of thumb doesn’t appear to apply either. Take Michael Douglas for instance. After years of smoking, he then became a victim of Throat Cancer. On the surface of it, that isn’t unusual for a 66 year old smoker. Worse still Douglas must have been ignoring his sore throat and niggley cough because by the time he was diagnosed, the supremely wealthy actors’ cancer was classed as Stage 4. There isn’t a stage 5. Anyone with stage 4 cancer is realistically staring death in the face. It means your cancer has spread from its source into the lymph nodes and other parts of the body. With that in mind it seems almost unbelievable that last month, a healthy looking Douglas and his wife Catherine Zeta Jones were photographed by the Paparazzi having a leisurely smoke! Douglas has been told the Cancer has gone. Even the Rothschild owned media were unable to contrive a reason for his cure and as such The Guardian Newspaper hailed it a “Modern Miracle” .Hmmm. Well they would wouldn’t they? In the absence of “Modern Miracles” happening to the general population, the Millions of people afflicted with cancer every year are forced to put their lives in the hands of what is laughingly termed as ‘Modern’ medicine. This usually comes in the form of Chemotherapy. Chemotherapy or ‘chemo’ involves the patient having large doses of powerful drugs administered to them, usually intravenously. These drugs supposedly kill the cancer cells. Unfortunately more often than not they kill the patient as well. Not that any Doctor will volunteer that information to the patient. A Doctor will tell you that Chemo will destroy your immune system. No doubt he will also mention that the other side effects are hell and the chances are that you will lose all of your hair, Vomit almost continuously, suffer severe fatigue, swell up like a balloon and be left sterile. But its more than his job is worth to admit that more people die from Chemo or from other causes brought on as a direct result of having chemo, such as heart failure, than actually die of cancer. Cancer Research UK spends around £332 annually in their bid to find a cure. The USA is typically the biggest worldwide investor with the Government backed ‘National Cancer Institute’ receiving an annual budget of almost $6 Billion. To give you a further insight into the kind of money spent on research; the American Cancer Society raised a staggering $848 Billion in 2005. It would therefore be nigh on impossible to put a figure on the Trillions and Trillions of Pounds invested globally in Cancer research over the past 50 years or so. This begs the question, “What the hell are these researchers doing?” Think about it for a moment. When HIV first began to spread rapidly in the late 1970′s, early 1980′s, there was no known cure and scientifically very little known about the disease. Yet barely 30 years later, although still incurable, but given the right medication, a person with HIV can live an almost normal life. That includes having children and also having nigh on the same life expectancy as a non HIV sufferer. Unless you’re a HIV sufferer in Africa of course! But that’s a different story. However, Cancer and HIV are totally different things and as such the two can only be loosely compared. Never the less, given the time and money spent on cancer research surely we should be able to expect better than Chemotherapy by now? The NHS spends around £4.5 Billion a year on Chemo to treat cancer sufferers yet it is estimated that 75% of those who die, do so because of the Chemo rather than the cancer itself. Furthermore, it’s been recognized throughout the medical world for well over a decade that Chemo cannot completely eliminate tumours of the Lungs, Colon or the Breast. In fact statistics show that only 2.4 % of Cancers respond successfully to Chemotherapy. Despite this fact Chemotherapy is still used to treat all three of the afore mentioned cancers, with the NHS spending £100 Million annually on the Breast cancer drug, ‘Herceptin’ alone. It would however, be unfair to hold the NHS Doctors responsible for treating patients with drugs that do a person more harm than good. The vast majority of Doctors and Nurses within the NHS are dedicated, over worked and under paid professionals who do the best they can with the medicines they are given. At the same time they find themselves having to work in poorly equipped, below par, unhygienic Hospitals and within the confines of a woefully inadequate budget. And while the £4.5 Billion handed over to the NHS by the British Government for treating cancer may sound like a huge sum, it actually works out at a measly £76 per head. Never the less, whilst there can be no doubting the dedication shown by the medical teams working for the NHS, the saying “You pay Peanuts, You get Monkeys” is also hugely applicable. In stark contrast, the exact opposite is true over in the USA, where the highly paid Doctors work in clean, modern, well equipped hospitals. They are however, more likely to be dedicated to the Dollar bill than the dying patient. Course, this is only because treatment is paid for by medical insurance over there, which doesn’t explain why American cancer patients are also treated via Chemotherapy. However, Better Surgeons, better working conditions and better equipment would explain why only 40% of Cancer patients die in the USA in comparison to 60% of patients in the UK. It’s not really surprising then, to learn that the UK also has by far the worst survival rate of all our European counterparts. So by doing a quick recap of the statistics and the available information we can say with a high degree of certainty the following things: (1)that over the past 110 years cancer has gone from affecting an acceptable 1 in every 100 people to a totally unacceptable and apparently inexplicable 1 in every 2 or 3 people. (2)The above doesn’t apply to the Social Elite who appear to be more akin with the 1 in 100 statistic. (3) Despite at least 50 years of allegedly serious research into cancer, funded by an indeterminately huge amount of money, the advances in treatments, despite what we are led to believe, is negligible. Furthermore, the general consensus is that we are losing the so called war on cancer. (4)Despite 48% of people now likely to be affected by cancer, and the UK’s shameful survival rate amongst patients in comparison to our European and US counterparts, the government remain apathetic towards the epidemic as well as to the reason for the unequalled leap in numbers. Similarly the British government’s level of concern is all too apparent by their unwillingness to invest in better qualified Doctors, treatment and equipment. I am in no doubt that some of you reading this article will never the less, pour scorn on the above by claiming that statistics can vary greatly depending on which side of the fence the statistician stands. I would also be the first to admit that statistics can be massaged and/or tailored to suit a user’s need. However in writing this article i have also drawn on personal experience to back up the statistics. My immediate family is quite small. My Mother was an only child and my Father had only the one Brother. This obviously means i only have one blood uncle and one Aunt through marriage. I am the 2nd eldest of 4 boys produced by my parents. In keeping in line with the Statistics, i can reveal that my paternal Grandfather suffered various bouts of cancer before finally dying from the disease. My maternal Grandmother officially died of a Heart attack but the autopsy revealed she also had cancer. My Father who is now in his 70′s is currently battling Cancer. Ten years ago, while in my thirties (relatively young, again in line with the statistics) i was found to have a tumour containing 2 types of cancer, one aggressive ,the other with a tendency to stay localised. Both types however were malignant. Luckily i sensed something wasn’t right very early on and as a result the tumour was removed without the cancer spreading thus saving me the need to undergo Chemotherapy. While that is counted as a blessing i still had to endure 2 further unnecessary and avoidable operations as a direct result of the hospitals poor communication between departments and through a lack of experience and skill on the surgeon’s behalf. At one point they were contemplating sending me to a London hospital to fix the damage caused by their surgeon’s incompetence. I also had to attend the hospital twice monthly for the first 2 years following the original operation. Notwithstanding the negligence which led to the 2 avoidable operations, i was also able to witness first hand through my twice monthly follow up appointments the hospitals inability to keep tabs on the most basic of information, the poorly trained extremely stressed medical staff and the inevitable 2 hour wait past appointment times, mainly due to chronic staff shortages. Neither could i fail to notice that the higher up the rankings the medical staff were, the less compassionate and understanding they appeared to be, while at the same time there was a marked rise in their arrogance and aloofness. In addition to My Grandfather, My Father and Myself, either dying, battling or being in remission from Cancer, 2 of my Mothers Aunts and her Uncle have died from Cancer. The younger of the 2 Aunts, only being in her mid-40′s when she died. I also lost a very close friend , who died from Testicular cancer at the age of 23 in the early 1980′s.The intensive Chemotherapy he underwent and which left me unable to recognize him failed to stop the cancer spreading to his Brain. My younger Brothers, Father in Law died from cancer a couple of years ago which at the time was within a few short months of him being diagnosed. My older brother’s girlfriend died of cancer while in her early 20′s. My youngest brothers, lifelong friend died at the age of20 during the course of a relatively minor operation following an accident on a push bike. He was found to be riddled with cancer as was the Mother of another close friend of mine who also died during a routine exploratory operation. My parent’s friend and neighbour who lived directly opposite them died of cancer while in his 50′s and there are countless other people who i have known throughout my life who have either had or died of cancer. Hell! We have even had to have 2 family pet Dogs put down because of Cancer. However, the one case that backs up and highlights what I’ve been saying more than any other is that of my one time girlfriend, who went on to become a very close personal friend as well as my boss at work. Sometime in late November, or early December 2006, i forget which, she was referred to hospital after finding a lump in her Breast which she was subsequently told was just a Cyst. By late January 2007 the lump had grown a lot bigger and she was experiencing a nagging ache to the side of the breast which extended to her underarm. She was again referred to the hospital in February. This time the hospital did an immediate biopsy of the lump, quickly followed by the removal of a malignant tumour from her breast along with some lymph nodes from her arm pit. She was then told she was to undergo 6 months of intensive Chemotherapy to be followed by, if i remember rightly, 3 months of Radiotherapy. Radiotherapy is another out-dated form of Cancer Treatment. I’ve never understood the wisdom behind treating cancer with something that causes cancer. But i digress… Following the 6 months of Chemotherapy my friend was looking forward to a couple of weeks break in her treatment, prior to her starting the Radiotherapy. On the Saturday afternoon of the August Bank Holiday weekend, which was little more than a week following her last chemo session , we were sat outside the café next door to where we worked , having a chat and a cup of Tea. It was here that i noticed all the veins in her arm had collapsed leaving what looked like rows of deep trenches in her skin. These “trench,” like grooves ran from the inside of her elbow joint, nearly all the way down to her wrist. The collapse, she told me, was a direct result from where she had been intravenously administered the Chemo. After having a Brief chat about her arm, we concluded work for the day and i left her with the parting words that i would see her Tuesday Morning. That was the last time i ever saw or spoke to her again, because she died of a massive heart attack on the Bank Holiday Monday. She had no history of heart problems, what so ever and had only very recently turned 46 years of age… At this point i should say that, long before i woke up to the fact that we live in an illusion of reality, i had already realised that something wasn’t right with regards to cancer. I had long cottoned on to the fact that those with power and money seemed by and large to be unaffected by the disease. This led me to the conclusion that the Social Elite knew something that the rest of us didn’t. Fast forward a couple of years and i now had no doubts what so ever that there was a cure for cancer. What’s more, there is now an abundance of evidence to back this up. Two of the more damming pieces of evidence revolve around that of two totally unconnected Doctors, the first of which is evidenced by the transcripts of 3 secretly recorded tape recordings of reminiscences given by Dr Lawrence Dunegan in 1988. Dr Dunegan had been invited to attend a meeting of student Doctors destined to be future leaders in medicine, in Pittsburgh USA on March 20th 1969. The meeting was hosted by prominent Doctor, Richard Day. Before addressing his assembly Dr Day, who at the time was the Head of the Rockefeller controlled eugenics organisation, ‘The Planned Parent Federation of America ‘ ordered that there should be no record taken of his speech. Dr Dunegan however disregarded the order and surreptitiously took down notes on napkins. It was these notes that formed the basis of the secretly recorded interview that Dr Dunegan gave to Mr Randy Engel in 1988.Dr Dunegan told Randy that during the course of this 1969 speech, Dr Day said “We can cure almost every cancer right now. The information is on file in the Rockefeller Institute, if it’s ever decided it should be released”. There is a lot more to this story and it is well documented on various internet sites. A particularly well written and detailed account can be found at this link: http://www.overlordsofchaos.com/html/new_o...barbarians.html The 2nd piece of damming evidence revolves around the work of an Italian Doctor, Tullio Simoncini, a brilliant and courageous man who refused to buckle under the enormous pressure he had to face and which he still continues to face to this day. Dr Simoncini has had to endure being disbarred from practising medicine as well as having to endure the indignity of serving a 3 year prison sentence imposed on him. His crime, Dr Simoncini had discovered that Cancer is a fungus caused by Candida, a yeast type organism found in small amounts within the human body. In doing so he was able to devise a cheap remedy of unparalleled success in curing cancer. This was true even in cases where the cancer was so advanced, that all other treatments had been stopped. Instead of being feted as a genius and touted as the saviour of untold lives, Simoncini was ordered to stop work on his program and to remain silent on his findings. A much more in depth, detailed account of Dr Tullio Simoncini and his work can be found here :http://www.theshenclinic.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=28%3Astory3&catid=4%3Astories&lang=en Along with this evidence which points to the fact that Cancer is highly curable, also comes the question ‘ If cancer can be cured, why is it being kept secret? For those of us who recognise the true evil that is ingrained into the very core of the Social Elite, that question is easy to answer. However for the benefit of those who don’t i will explain in brief why we are deemed not worthy of access to the cure? It is a two pronged answer, the first of which boils down to money. The Pharmaceutical industry is a multi-trillion pound business, with huge fortunes to be made by those at the top. A single new drug typically costs around £500 million to produce. Of course these new drugs are always hailed as a miracle cure but take between 10-12 years to produce. Over that period of time, the said miracle drug is by and large forgotten by the general public. Needless to say, these so called wonder drugs never live up to their hype, as is evidenced by the rapidly rising cases of all cancers. The industry is inherently corrupt, with billions of pounds in bribes being passed back and forth. The sheer greed that exists amongst those with power ensures that human lives will never take precedence over the vast fortunes to be made from cancer. The second part of the answer relates to control. The Social Elite have an all-consuming desire to exercise total control over the world’s resources and its population. Indeed it is their quest for total world dominance that drives their Psychopathic needs. Notwithstanding the huge boost given to their already vastly over inflated egos by having the answers to the many secrets we are not privy to, Cancer is a huge weapon in their quest to reduce the world population. This would explain the quantum leap in the number of cancer cases over the past 110 years. Having spent many years researching the activities of the Illuminate, i am left in no doubt what so ever that we are deliberately being exposed to cancer by design. This exposure takes place largely within the food we buy. An in depth explanation, with statistics to back this claim can be found here: http://intuitivefred888.blogspot.com/2011/...and-beyond.html Further evidence to support this claim came directly from the Horse’s mouth so to speak, when Prince Charles recently appeared on the ITV television program, ‘This Morning’. While showing the shows presenter around his organic vegetable garden, the monotonous, uncharismatic heir to the throne couldn’t help but boast that he and his family were totally self-sufficient in the food department. God forbid the buffoon should ever have to be exposed to eating the genetically modified, chemical infested stuff we are forced to buy from the illuminate owned supermarkets. As well as being exposed to the cancer giving chemicals in our food we a forced to swallow them in the form of fluoride in our drinking water. While the government are all too aware of the health risks associated with fluoride they have increased the levels in our drinking water. This was done following the governments commissioning of a report from Cambridge University looking into the long term effects fluoride had on the human body. The government then used carefully chosen ‘key’ words from this report as proof that fluoride was safe. However the author of the report has stated on camera that far from giving the Government the green light to increase fluoride levels, his recommendation was that levels should in fact be reduced. There is absolutely no need to use fluoride in drinking water as our teeth get all the fluoride they need from toothpaste. Sweden, a country that banned the use of fluoride in drinking water years ago (As have most Continental European Countries) Commissioned a major survey into the effect the ban had on the nations teeth. The report came back clearly indicating that there had been no increase in tooth decay. As if exposing us to the risk of cancer via our food and drink supply isn’t sufficient enough, The Government are further polluting the air we breathe with god knows what via chem-trails. Chemtrails is the name given to the visible vapour trail left behind as a result of an aeroplane discharging Chemicals at high altitude. They first began to appear in our sky around 1997. Chemtrails are not to be confused with Contrails, the name given to an aeroplanes equivalent of a cars exhaust smoke. Contrails will disappear after 5 minutes or so where as Chemtrails can hang about for hours. Chemtrails are often visible in a criss cross formation as a result of the aeroplane flying back and forth so as to ensure blanket covering of an area. This is achieved in very much the same way as a farmer will use a Bi-plane’ for crop spraying. While many would have you believe that Chemtrails are no more than a Conspiracy Theory, the sheer volume of photographic evidence available on the internet confirms Chemtrails are far more likely to be Conspiracy Probability. Something is certainly responsible for the sharp decrease in Male fertility over the past 10 years. Would it not make sense for a group of people intent on orchestrating a large population reduction program to target the source? If that was the case, would it then not be unreasonable to assume that whatever is being used to reduce fertility in the male population could have the potential to also cause Cancer? Once again, assuming that fact is also correct, would that not then account for the previously unexplained reason for the sharp increase in the number of men developing Testicular Cancer? Finally, no one would deny that cancer is a life changing illness. Speaking from my own experience there is a marked change in the way you view life before developing cancer to the way you view life having survived it. On the whole i would suggest that the shift in perception is for the better. However the route you have to take to achieve the shift is precarious and undesirable to say the least. As far as the UK route is concerned more cancer sufferers fail to make it to the other end than those of us who do. The more precarious the route becomes the more desperate the victim becomes in a frantic search to find a life line to hang on to. The Blind panic caused by the desperation to find a life line can often lead to that person putting his faith in the nearest one to hand, only to find he’s made the wrong choice and his lifeline has no substance to it. As i have already stated, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind what so ever that cancer is highly curable. Neither do i have any doubts that we are being deliberately exposed to the risk of cancer and that those who succumb are receiving treatment akin to a medical variation of Russian roulette. However, i have only reached these conclusions through my own research into the subject along with my own personal experience of cancer and most importantly of all my inner self telling me it is so. I would therefore advise anyone, who having read this article, is now planning on skipping their next bout of Chemotherapy in favour of an alternative treatment, not to do so unless they have properly researched the subject and if their inner self tells them it the right thing to do. I say this because there are, literally hundreds of website on the internet guaranteeing you your survival if you follow their advice. Sadly the only guarantee the vast majority of these sites should be offering is that you’ll end up dead very quickly. POINTS OF REFERENCE OTHER THAN THOSE ALREADY CONTAINED WITHIN THE ARTICLE http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons...99/rp99-111.pdf http://www.healthandwholeness.info/blog/20...00-years-apart/ http://www.ucan-behealthy.com/cancer/how-m...ncer-each-year/ http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/sep/01...s-cancer-spread http://www.avert.org/hiv-treatment-uk.htm http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/20...of-cancer-care/ http://www.americanchinesemedicineassociat...hemotherapy.htm http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_dea_...ath-from-cancer http://www.irishhealth.com/article.html?id=14924 http://educate-yourself.org/ct/ http://www.wikipedia.org/ |
| QUOTE (AdoramusTe) |
| Brilliant article, or atleast it was until the point when it mentioned chemtrails. |
| QUOTE (Clare) |
| Looks like cancer is basically thrush. |